User talk:AleszJaTuTylkoSprzątam

This is AleszJaTuTylkoSprzątam's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Konstantin Konstantinovich Stefanovich (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Grand Duke Konstantin Konstantinovich of Russia, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Konstantin Konstantinovich Stefanovich and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 11:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is sad news to me that my article has not been accepted, for the reason that there is already one, I have this question,how do I know that such a draft already exists? How could i verify it? AleszJaTuTylkoSprzątam (talk) 11:13, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reviewer can't reply but I can, you can search Draft:(your planned draft name) at the search bar, if there is one, you should refrain from making a draft and help the other one instead. TheNuggeteer (talk) 11:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AleszJaTuTylkoSprzątam! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 11:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel Karol Korecki has been accepted

Samuel Karol Korecki, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Youknow? (talk) 14:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forward.ops

Left a message at the talk page for Forward.ops. Tell me if something is still wrong. TheNuggeteer (talk) 07:00, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He insisted to delete the page. TheNuggeteer (talk) 07:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok, but the thing is that he does articles quickly and then it's badly written , but he knows how to write it, just needs to do it slowly not quickly. AleszJaTuTylkoSprzątam (talk) 07:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is okay for him to write articles badly, that's why we have the Guild of Copyeditors of GOCE. English might be his second language. TheNuggeteer (talk) 07:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, AleszJaTuTylkoSprzątam, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! TheNuggeteer (talk) 11:10, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Konstantin Konstantinovich Stefanovich (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This entire draft is supported by a single source. That isn't enough to establish notability per WP:GNG. It might (?) be enough for WP:NPOL, but the subject is described as a civil servant, as well as appointee to a senate position, neither of which are included in NPOL. I'm happy to be proven wrong on this, but I don't think notability is there, either way.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Konstantin Konstantinovich Stefanovich and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing there are no more studies on this person, there is only this source unfortunately AleszJaTuTylkoSprzątam (talk) 15:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to ask at the AfC help desk (WP:AFCHD) for a second opinion, but I can't see how this subject could be notable if this is really the only source available. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can even give a PDF, that's probably my mistake for not giving one, for which I apologise AleszJaTuTylkoSprzątam (talk) 15:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Battle of Oździutycze

added a link pointing to Church tower

Defense of Kopanki

added a link pointing to Pacification

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removing information on battles

Your claim that articles such as Battle of Gdeszyn are describing a "clash" instead of a battle is not at all a good reason to delete the infobox on the page. Please do not continue with removals of this kind. I have reverted the two you did today. -- Fyrael (talk) 15:04, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I see there is a disagreement , in the chat where there is a debate over the removal of the article Marcelus even showed that this is not a battle but some kind of rally lunb robbery, here AleszJaTuTylkoSprzątam (talk) 15:09, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Polish–Ukrainian conflict (1939–1947), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Borsuk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:45, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

test

~AleszJaTuTylkoSprzątam ^talk AleszJaTuTylkoSprzątam (talk) 08:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Altenmann

Here's a user I think you will get along just fine with: User:Altenmann Dark4tune (talk) 18:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

??? AleszJaTuTylkoSprzątam (talk) 21:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kazimierz Bartoszewski moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kazimierz Bartoszewski, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:47, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stanisław Sebastian Bronicki moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Stanisław Sebastian Bronicki, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]