User talk:AllegroMastermind

July 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to G-sharp minor has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: G-sharp minor was changed by AllegroMastermind (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858426 on 2018-07-14T04:59:56+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:59, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Betty Logan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 07:11, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content to the home media sections of film articles as you did at here. You have been an editor on Wikipedia for a couple of years now and should be aware that WP:Verifiability requires non-trivial claims need to be backed up by a source. It is particularly problematic when you insert the content into a sentence or paragraph that is sourced, creating the illusion that the claims you are adding are also sourced. WP:CT explains how to cite a source, and if you need assistance you can either ask on the article talk page or at my talk page. Betty Logan (talk) 13:37, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Release date changes[edit]

Please stop changing release dates without explaination. If you have a source that suggests a different date than what is already on the article, please source your change. Waxworker (talk) 13:19, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gaplus, you may be blocked from editing. Namcokid 47 ^(Contribs) 15:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted your edits to E major because it was grammatically incorrect and didn't add anything substantial to the article. bibliomaniac 1 5 18:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AllegroMastermind. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ST47 (talk) 05:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock #1[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AllegroMastermind (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for sockpuppetry, because I'm so sad..... AllegroMastermind (talk) 7:44 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. If you continue to waste our time with unblock requests like this, your talk page access will be revoked. only (talk) 11:47, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock #2[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AllegroMastermind (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me because I want to edit. AllegroMastermind (talk) 02:10, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 07:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you do not address the reasons for your block as detailed above, your ability to edit this page may be removed. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 07:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Showtime Tawag ng Tanghalan Year 4 Logo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Showtime Tawag ng Tanghalan Year 4 Logo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:32, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]