User talk:Alynaa
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
Chris Troutman (talk) 15:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Alynaa!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there! This message was delivered by Chris Troutman (talk) 15:46, 28 October 2014 (UTC) |
Alynaa, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Alynaa! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:23, 28 October 2014 (UTC) |
Proposed deletion of Hera Pheri 3
[edit]The article Hera Pheri 3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- fails WP:NFF - it hasnt started production and there is no significant coverage outside of the standard hype of "so and so has announced their next project!!!!!!!!!
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:54, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Article edited and improved have a look!.--Alynaa (talk) 00:49, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Hera Pheri 3
[edit]The article Hera Pheri 3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- fails WP:NFF has not entered production and no indication of anything other than the standard prepromotional hype.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Please have a deeper look into the article!!!!!
- I have looked and all I see is a project that hasn't entered production and all that exists is gossip and rumors about who might or might not be involved in something (that given the vagueries of the film industry may never happen). see WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL and understand that we are NOT a celebrity gossip mag. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Then what the hell am i supposed to do !--Alynaa (talk) 18:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Wait until there are reliable sources that have significant content about the project AFTER filming has begun. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:53, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of MasterChef India (season 4)
[edit]The article MasterChef India (season 4) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- fails WP:NFF a future program, only standard promotional hype
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
why the fuck are you after me you piece of shit! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alynaa (talk • contribs) 01:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Because after the last time you started an article about a premature topic you asked "what do you want me to do?" and I told you "wait until the subject actually meets the criteria for having an article" and then hours later you created another article about a subject that fails to meet the notability criteria and so it appears that you are here to be purposefully disruptive and not constructively create an encyclopedia. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
January 2015
[edit]Hello, I'm Strongjam. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Strongjam (talk) 02:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- I was coming here to say the same thing. this is not a civil comment. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dabangg 3 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dabangg 3 (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:41, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Hangover (Salman Khan, Shreya Ghoshal and Meet Bros Anjjan song)
[edit]The article Hangover (Salman Khan, Shreya Ghoshal and Meet Bros Anjjan song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No claims of notability made. Fails WP:NSONG for no multiple, non-trivial, independent sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:23, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Bang Bang (Benny Dayal and Neeti Mohan song)
[edit]The article Bang Bang (Benny Dayal and Neeti Mohan song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No claims of notability. Fails WP:NSONGS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
The article Satra Ko Shaadi Hai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unreleased film, tagged since 2014 as non notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Satra Ko Shaadi Hai for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Satra Ko Shaadi Hai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satra Ko Shaadi Hai (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC)