User talk:Andrew0711171

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Papas Scooperia HD

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Papas Scooperia HD, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Andrew0711171 (talk) 20:29, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because competency is required to edit Wikpedia; creating multiple accounts to make the same disruptive edits that require clean up by multiple admins is disruptive when done by one account, let alone two.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andrew0711171 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i will never make test pages without using the sandbox again Andrew0711171 (talk) 20:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|reason=I will never abuse again and i will make useful threads and no longer do bad threads ~~~~}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andrew0711171 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i will never make non useful arctickea and start making useful arcticles so thats all Andrew0711171 (talk) 21:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have been blocked for abusing multiple accounts, and for a general lack of competence. A mess made while trying to be helpful remains a mess. If you wish to be unblocked, show that you understand what you did wrong and exactly how you will change in the future. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 23:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andrew0711171 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not vandelize wikipedia and use companse and makee the encyclepedia better and add refrences

Decline reason:

You are globally locked due to abuse across several wikis. It's clear that you lack the needed skills to be able to participate here at this time. When that changes, you will need to first contact a steward to get the global lock removed. 331dot (talk) 08:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

tell me why did i be blocked

You have used and abused multiple accounts, and you have a lack of general competence, both of which is violating the guidelines of Wikipedia (see WP:SOSP and WP:CIR). In addition, you seemed to be making many research pages and test edits that are considered disruptive, which is not allowed in the slightest. That’s why you have been blocked.JTZegers (talk) 00:32, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]