User talk:AnimationWhiz133

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! The Old JacobiteThe '45 04:20, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Your Username[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "LesMiserablesMovie", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it implies a promotional connection with the Les Miserables movie.... If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. We'll have the full story... at 11! 22:34, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gag (BDSM). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tonywalton Talk 01:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

MediCinema[edit]

Hello AnimationWhiz133,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, MediCinema, may be copied from http://www.medicinema.org.uk/about-us.aspx. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 17:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MediCinema, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bill Paterson, Newcastle and John Hodge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Two Women, One Heart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rejection (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:10, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Amy Gregson[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Amy Gregson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I do not think the available information shows notability for this animator

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 07:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Flood (animator), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages America and Labour Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 11:18, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, AnimationWhiz133. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 11:47, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of The Freak Next Door for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Freak Next Door is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Freak Next Door until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:01, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Two Women, One Heart for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Two Women, One Heart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Freak Next Door until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:06, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Mark Flood (animator)[edit]

Please do not remove the tags again. It's disruptive and it could lead to a block of your account. Thanks. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:58, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amy Gregson[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amy Gregson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. CaroleHenson (talk) 06:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

[edit conflict]

Please note that the proper procedure for contesting a deletion tag is to discuss the matter per the message on the article page. Removing the tag is not the appropriate was to resolve the issue.
If you are able to find published articles, books or other references that address the question regarding notability, it is best to make note of that on the discussion page. You may want to look at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons and Wikipedia:Notability guidelines as well. The deletion policy is at Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Deletion of biographies and BLPs--CaroleHenson (talk) 06:28, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Imraan Ali[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Imraan Ali requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Grayfell (talk) 06:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Idea for an article that might pass notability tests?[edit]

You've put in a lot of effort for several articles that are a bit ahead of their time in terms of notability. If you have an idea for an article of interest to you that is more likely to pass notability (the quick test is to see if there are newspaper articles or books about the topic) -- I would be happy to help you get one off the ground.--CaroleHenson (talk) 06:53, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

MediCinema might be the perfect article, if you're interested. The following link has several news articles news articles, if you're interested. I removed the information that came directly from her site and started off the article with information from a news article and from a hospital. This could turn out to be a really great article if you'd like to work on it.--CaroleHenson (talk) 09:59, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
I got a little carried away, but I'll stop for now. Some ideas for additional information to add to the article, after finding secondary sources, preferably news or books, are:
  • more about clinical outcomes, such as Evaluation of the MediCinema Experience was undertaken by Tom Rice MA MA MRes assisted by Joanna Purchase BSc
  • integration of digital technology
  • Christine Hill (now honorary president) leadership being passed to Stephen Moore, chief executive
  • info about trustees and their roles
  • Serennu Children's Centre in Newport
  • More about 2013 installations: Guy's Hospital in London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital in London and at the Birmingham Children's Hospital
Are any of these of interest to you?--CaroleHenson (talk) 21:16, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Some sources:

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, AnimationWhiz133. You have new messages at CaroleHenson's talk page.
Message added 22:32, 10 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

CaroleHenson (talk) 22:32, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, AnimationWhiz133. You have new messages at CaroleHenson's talk page.
Message added 22:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

CaroleHenson (talk) 22:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Spam links[edit]

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to PACE Theatre Company. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Psycho cinema[edit]

Hi,

Since I'm posting the talkback on here anyway, I thought I'd respond on Psyco cinema ( http://www.fit.edu/caps/cinema.php#domestic) here. Great to hear that you're interested.

How would you like to get started? Would you like me to start the shell for you and get a couple of things rolling? Or, would you like to do that. Or, another idea.

Oh, I was a bit confused because I started with a non-Wikipedia article on Cinematherapy - and thought in my mind that I had started with a Wikipedia article. It might be better to name the article Cinema Therapy, which is defined here http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Cinema+Therapy.

There will likely be several issues to address to ensure notabilty:

  • clear definition of what it is
  • what it does, types of issues addressed by what type of movie
  • studies that show the clinical effect of cinematherapy
  • examples, like MediCinema

Whatever works for you is good for me. Hope you're having a good day!--CaroleHenson (talk) 16:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Do you want to have a go at starting the page, I'll give you a hand when I can with the refining etc.--AnimationWhiz133 (talk) 21:36, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Sure. I'd be happy to start the Cinema therapy article.--CaroleHenson (talk) 05:00, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
I got the article started - and there are lots of great sources:
Does anything there interest you to expand the article?--CaroleHenson (talk) 00:26, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

I thought maybe there should be a mention of more of the hospitals that have a Medicinema? And perhaps even a mention to how cinema therapy was almost spoofed in the film A Clockwork Orange?--AnimationWhiz133 (talk) 15:28, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Regarding adding more Medicinema hospitals, it's best to just provide a tease so that people read the MediCinema article. The point of links are so that data does not need to be replicated throughout articles. I hope that makes sense
The spoofing of cinema therapy in Clockwork Orange sounds great!!! Do you have a source and text for that? That would be an interesting addition--CaroleHenson (talk) 03:38, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Could you not probably use just some articles that tell the plot maybe? Or would you be looking for something a bit more in-depth?--AnimationWhiz133 (talk) 21:27, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi, if you're talking about the spoofing of cinema therapy in Clockwork Orange, I think you just need to find some sources that discuss how cinema therapy is spoofed in the film, as a dissenting opinion about cinema therapy.
The funny thing is, though, that I ran this query and so far I'm seeing Clockwork Orange as a suggested cinema therapy movie for psychiatric disorders, but not seeing anything so far about spoofing of cinema therapy. Do you know where there's a source for the spoofing aspect?--CaroleHenson (talk) 14:54, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Medicinema sources[edit]

Thanks for finding more information about Medicinema -- looking on the subject's website can be a good way of finding information. The second step is to see if the information can be included, by finding out if there's a non-primary, reliable sources of the information. In this case, the following url tynesidecinema.co.uk had the information.

This link is a blog, which cannot be used, so I removed it.--CaroleHenson (talk) 17:15, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Mark Flood and secondary sources.[edit]

Hello, I removed a lot of stuff you had added to Mark Flood (animator). If you would like to expand the article, I encourage you to find WP:SECONDARY sources for the information. Too much of your additions do not indicate how they are notable. Adding information about him is great, but Wikipedia isn't an indiscriminate collection of information, and listing his favorite bands and TV shows isn't encyclopedic. It may all be true, but that's not really what Wikipedia is about. It's not just about what's factual, but also about what is notable, and what is verifiable. I would advise you to hold back on adding personal details until there is more independent coverage of him and his work. Grayfell (talk) 21:44, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi there. I believe there is going to be an article about the Mark Flood animations team released in the near future, so I will hopefully be able to use that as a secondary source. Thank you--AnimationWhiz133 (talk) 06:48, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alan Orr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page STV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

IMDB as a source.[edit]

You should be aware that IMDb is not generally considered a reliable source (see WP:ELPEREN). Having a link at the bottom of a page is fine, and there are a number of templates for doing that (Template:IMDb has a list). However, because it has an excessive amount of detail and is mostly user-generated content, it is not appropriate as a source for Wikipedia. Grayfell (talk) 22:04, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Why is IMDb not considered a reliable source? AnimationWhiz133 (talk) 22:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia has a policy of against relying on self published sources (WP:SPS). IMDb allows users to submit content, much like Wikipedia itself. Because of this, it's very hard to verify content from IMDb, and Wikipedia:Verifiability is, understandably, very important. My understanding is that IMDb has been singled-out specifically because it has had a long history of being wrong about important details, but I may be mistaken about that. Anyway, verifiability is especially important for articles about living people for a number of ethical and legal reasons (see WP:BLP for more on that). Grayfell (talk) 22:26, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Mark Flood (animator) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Flood (animator) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Flood (animator) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 11:24, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Jack Morrison (actor) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Morrison (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Flood (animator) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 11:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC)


Can you please contact me at slfolks13@gmail.com ? Slfolks13 (talk) 23:10, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. What for? AnimationWhiz133 (talk) 10:32, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I think that your article on Mark Flood (Animator) is worth preserving. Please contact me at slfolks13@gmail.com Slfolks13 (talk) 23:04, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi there. Do you maybe want to put your reason on the deletion article? Thanks a lot AnimationWhiz133 (talk) 10:45, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Flood (animator)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mark Flood (animator), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 23:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Why did you recreate it? You do realize it will just be deleted, right? Jauerbackdude?/dude. 23:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

It deserves to be kept, that's why. AnimationWhiz133 (talk) 13:04, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Well, unfortunately, that's not how Wikipedia works. I would strongly advise you against recreating it again (at least until he's notable by Wikipedia's definition, not yours), because that's considered disruptive. Thanks. Jauersockdude?/dude. 13:14, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]