Jump to content

User talk:Anna Zelenska

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Welcome!

Hello, Anna Zelenska, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Dege31 (talk) 20:22, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anna Zelenska. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Role of microglia in synaptic plasticity".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 12:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 14:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Anna Zelenska! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 14:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

[edit]

Please help me to recover User:Anna Zelenska/sandbox 2 - is it possible? I would like to link this sandbox page with the Wiki article Memory T cells (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_T_cell) and put really a lot of efforts into writing it, but did not manage to link it with the existing Wiki page... can I ask you how to do that? I would be very grateful for your help.

Anna Zelenska (talk) 07:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Anna Zelenska/sandbox 2 has not been deleted. It does not need recovery.
Your sandbox has many links to articles, you do not appear to need assistance with that.
Articles should not link to user sandboxes. Once your sandbox is accepted as an article - if you choose to submit it - and it is promoted to mainspace, that is the time for other articles to link to it.
The level of skill with wiki syntax shown in your sandbox is not shown in your post here. It seems... incongruous? Cabayi (talk) 09:24, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your reply. Unfortunately, I am not so good with wiki synthax, I just used a visual editing mode to create my sandbox pages. I did not understand how I could post my draft for review by the wiki editors, but already found a link that gives a good explanation of how to move a draft article into the Wikipedia livespace. Anna Zelenska (talk) 14:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

COI

[edit]

Hi, Anna. As mentioned here in some of your other work, "Wikipedia is not a research abstracts repository". Writing for Wikipedia is different than journal writing in many ways. To avoid excess detail, Wikilinks are used to link to articles for concepts already explained elsewhere, encyclopedic tone is different than medical writing, and broad overview articles like multiple sclerosis must reflect due weight and not go in to excess detail. So, for example, emerging hypotheses are given less space in articles than those already established via multiple secondary reviews. While in journal writing you may summarize a lot of primary research and synthesize them to form or support conclusions, in Wikipedia writing we need only state the conclusions supported by independent secondary sources and reviews.

I also recommend you declare any prior involvement with respect to the topic of the role of viruses in multiple sclerosis. We value your expertise, but learning to write in Wikipedia style can be a big transition from journal writing; please take a look at Wikipedia's policy on conflict of interest. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit, you have continued to add information that is better covered in other articles, after I have twice removed it and explained why here. Be sure you are aware of WP:3RR and WP:EDITWAR, and use the article talk page to gain consensus before adding material that has already been removed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]