User talk:Annaadoms

Hello, Annaadoms! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:47, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Regarding your edits to Categories and Templates[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! The Wikipedia Category and Template articles are not intended for you to add in additional people who are a member of those groups. Instead, they are used as a part of a new article that you would create. Please see the FAQ on using categories and writing your first article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Category:African actor stubs. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 22:42, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Nigeria-bio-stub, you will be blocked from editing. Amsaim (talk) 22:43, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Ufuoma Ejenobor. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:45, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look, you can't do that. Please cite some sources. Thanks. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 02:19, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ufuoma Ejenobor[edit]

Re your message: I have made no edits to Ufuoma Ejenobor nor did I delete any articles. What I did do was to leave you a note for you back in February about your incorrect edits to various Categories and Templates. These edits were incorrect usage of the Categories and Templates as my previous note to you stated. It does not matter whom you added, if they are notable or not. As my previous note to you stated, please review the FAQ on Categories and the Help page on Template usage. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:04, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you are trying to ask. Is there something else I can help you with? -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:08, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: I think you are confused. My note to you back in February has nothing to do with the article at Ufuoma Ejenobor. It has to do with the edits you made back in February when you first started to edit Wikipedia and were still learning about how to edit. It is these edits that my note back in February was about. It has nothing to do with any edits you have done in July. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:43, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Ufuoma Ejenobor. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Drmies (talk) 06:03, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Earth references[edit]

Wikipedia articles may not use other Wikipedia articles as references, but instead require reliable sources. Please revise this article accordingly. In most cases, you will likely find appropriate references in the articles you provided as references, but be sure to check for accuracy. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:35, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of J bones[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on J bones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Acroterion (talk) 14:57, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of J bones[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on J bones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Acroterion (talk) 15:08, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 15:17, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to the inclusion guidelines for individuals and for musicians. Acroterion (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

The Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard is not for complaints about the deletions of non-notable individuals. The article was correctly deleted per WP:SPEEDY as lacking WP:BIO notability. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:48, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Ufuoma Ejenobor, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 18:58, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ufuoma Ejenobor. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Amsaim (talk) 00:08, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: ufuoma ejenobor[edit]

Re your message: I had nothing to do with the reverting of your recent edits to Ufuoma Ejenobor. Please discuss the matter with the editor who reverted your changes: Amsaim (talk · contribs). However, Amsaim was correct that your additions were not properly sourced as the sources that you linked to do not exist. You may add the material again if you can provide the correct references. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:41, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: As I told you before, I had nothing to do with the reverting of your recent edits to Ufuoma Ejenobor. Please discuss the matter with the editor who reverted your changes: Amsaim (talk · contribs). Complaining to me about the issue will not resolve the issue. I rechecked your references and only one exists. The other three are invalid links. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:16, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Ufuoma Ejenobor, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 11:33, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]