User talk:AnnabelleDolly

June 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Patti LuPone, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. PHANTOMTECH (talk) 22:04, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Asia Argento. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 22:14, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kirstie Alley, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Kirstie Alley was changed by AnnabelleDolly (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880342 on 2022-06-22T02:59:41+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:59, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Flintstones. BilCat (talk) 03:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 03:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]