User talk:Aravindakshansunil

Hello, Aravindakshansunil. You have new messages at Weeliljimmy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Welcome!

Hello, Aravindakshansunil, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 23:48, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Velayutham

I have redone the reviews that you had undone. Wikipedia strictly follows neutral ways in articles. The reviews may not be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tirupur123451 (talk • contribs) 09:03, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Tamil azhagiya magan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. -- IRP ☎ 22:22, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Wikipedia - Use don't AbUse constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Weeliljimmy ^talk 22:24, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Joseph Vijay.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Joseph Vijay.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of Image:IlayathalapathyVijay.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:IlayathalapathyVijay.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:14, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of Image:IlayathalapathyVijay.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IlayathalapathyVijay.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:14, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Joseph Vijay.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Joseph Vijay.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:29, 18 December 2008 (UTC) --J Milburn (talk) 19:29, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Vijay_King.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Vijay_King.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris 00:25, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Vijay-Flag.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Vijay-Flag.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris 00:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Vijay-Flag.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Vijay-Flag.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris 00:28, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Vijay Smart and Smilin.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Vijay Smart and Smilin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:59, 20 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 17:59, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Vettaikkaran.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vettaikkaran.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 18:01, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Sachein.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sachein.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --—SpaceFlight89 18:19, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Azhagiya Thamizh Magan.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Azhagiya Thamizh Magan.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpaceFlight89 18:19, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Your recent addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. —SpaceFlight89 18:20, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Vettaikkaran New Poster.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vettaikkaran New Poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --—SpaceFlight89 18:22, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Vettaikkaran Promo.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Vettaikkaran Promo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 18:48, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vettaikkaran.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vettaikkaran.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pastor Daniel Stanley

A tag has been placed on Pastor Daniel Stanley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 16:31, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. andy (talk) 16:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pastor Daniel Stanley was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to request article creation again once the issues have been addressed. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bradjamesbrown (talk) 05:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Elim New Anointing Church.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Elim New Anointing Church.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 02:50, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Daniel Stanley.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Daniel Stanley.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 02:51, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sura Vijay.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sura Vijay.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Pastor Daniel Stanley

Hello Aravindakshansunil. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Pastor Daniel Stanley.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pastor Daniel Stanley}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Technical 13 (talk) 02:29, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sura Vijay.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sura Vijay.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:45, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Improperly sourced content

Hi there, though I'm sure you meant well, your edits here at List of highest-grossing Indian films was not adequately supported by a reliable source. We don't use random Twitter accounts like this as a reference because anybody with an internet connection can set up a Twitter account and claim to be an expert in any field. Content must come from reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and a clear editorial policy. Also see our guidelines on user-generated content. Please do not resubmit these changes without providing a source that meets community standards. Thanks, and it's nothing personal. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:09, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of highest-grossing Indian films. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diff: [1] As previously noted, we do not accept faceless blogs as references. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:47, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Primary sources

Hi there, re: this edit, though you obviously mean well, it's problematic to use a primary source (a film's director, star, producer, distributor) for controversial content about their finances, because a primary source (i.e. someone who is financially involved in the project) would have every reason to inflate the financial data. For instance, a star would look better if the last movie they were in made a ton of money. A director would surely become a hot commodity if every film they directed pushed closer to 200 crore, etc. The information needs to be independently verified/estimated in order for it to be of any value to us. Thanks for understanding, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:02, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sura Vijay.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sura Vijay.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]