Jump to content

User talk:Arctic-Lizard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A tag has been placed on Tangled rope, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Maxamegalon2000 06:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

tangled rope

[edit]

I see that you're going to refute an AFD. You can refer to Wikipedia:Notability as suggested by Maxamagalon, but I'd rather suggest that you refer to this guidline: WP:MUSIC. If this band meets 2 or more of the requirements listed, address those issues and make sure you can properly site your sources. RiseRobotRise 06:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Has been featured in multiple non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media (excludes things like school newspapers (although university newspapers are usually fine), personal blogs, etc.)" "Has won or placed in a major music competition." "Is cited in notable and verifiable sources as being influential in style, technique, repertory or teaching in a particular music genre."

All of the above guide lines apply to Tangled Rope they are featured in many blogs and school newspapers, have won local rock music festival events including school events. Arctic-Lizard 05:52, 16 November 2006

Every time i go to contest the deletion, its deleted before my case is even heard. Wikipedia's guide line policy is a joke if i cant even rebut the case. If an admin user is reading this please re-evaluate the Tangled Rope wiki.

You have recently re-created the article Tangled Rope, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on In The Name Of Rock, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have done all of the above followed all of the rules, guide lines etc. Still i see notices popping up telling me about deletion. If you want to, you can follow the links at the bottom of the page leading to the bands sites for more information, if you want more reasons not to delete this article visit its talk page. (Arctic-Lizard) 08:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Just Helping

[edit]

I can assure you that the articles you have created will not survive deletion unless if you can assess their notablility. Although I do think that taking articles straight to deletion review is a little premature. You must assess their notability, and cite any reliable source. (i.e. notable newspapers, magazine articles, websites etc) If you can provide the information nessesary, your articles will have a chance to remain on wikipedia.
Please take the time to review these examples of other articles that have went though AFD


I hope you find this useful. RiseRobotRise 10:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plenty Valley FM

[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Plenty Valley FM, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Mattinbgn\ talk 23:09, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Tangled Rope - In The Name Of Rock.jpg

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Tangled Rope - In The Name Of Rock.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 07:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]