User talk:Aries009

Aries009, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Aries009! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Serena Williams. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Majora (talk) 05:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Maria Sharapova, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 07:30, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Serena Williams. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 07:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for harassing other users, as you did at User talk:4TheWynne. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:06, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aries009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was NOT harassing or attacking other users. I was simply trying to correct the disruptive, false narratives and fanatic bias editing of User talk:4TheWynne on the Maria Sharapova page. This user claims to be a fan of Maria Sharapova and is therefore applying a lot false narratives and untruths to inflate and exaggerate her story. For example, details of earnings as stated in the edits are false and have been inflated, the same with her career prize money, and other details relating to her career, which should NOT be acceptable. I assume Wikipedia is about providing factual narratives on an individual, not fanatic biased narratives to inflate somebody's reputation, so it is absolutely unfair to block me for trying to applying factual contributions Aries009 (talk) 16:02, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Disagreements over content should be discussed in a collegial manner on the article talk page, and not resolved by making personal attacks. If you genuinely believe that calling another editor a "piece of shit" is not a personal attack, then you do not belong here. If your next unblock request is as aggressive as this one and fails to address the reason for your block, I will be revoking your ability to edit this page too. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.