Jump to content

User talk:Arizonasqueeze

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi, Arizonasqueeze, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay.

You may want to read about the Five pillars of Wikipedia and simplified ruleset.

If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions.

For help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style.

If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and the FAQ.

If you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)!

There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library.

Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal.

Feel free to post questions on my user talk page or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will be by to help you shortly.

If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Five will get you the datestamp only.

You may want to add yourself to the new user log.

If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

On IRC, check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.

If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.

Happy Wiki-ing.Kf4bdy talk contribs

PS: This is not a bot and you did nothing to prompt this message. This is just a friendly welcome by a fellow Wikipedian.


Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --ArmadilloFromHell 07:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to remind you that the correct protocol once a speedy tag has been added to an article it to discuss it and/or add a hangon tag. Although at times speedy tags may be added to articles that may not out to be ok and subsequently removed, it is not correct for you to remove them. --ArmadilloFromHell 07:10, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Jarvis (Cricketer)

[edit]

Hello,

Many thanks for creating this page, I have been meaning to for a while as he is my Dad. When I get round to it I will stick a load more info up as well. sijarvis 20:21, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs references, so you really shouldn't remove the references template until some are added.Hatch68 04:15, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The category you created is a duplicate of the already-existing Category:FA Cup Final goalscorers - I've nominated it for deletion as I think the goalscorers category is better-named. In future could you please add [[Category:FA Cup Final goalscorers]] to articles instead? Thanks. Qwghlm 10:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Roger Morgan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 20:11, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted this {{prod}} and given the nominator yet another warning re their continued history of disruptive nominationsiridescenti (talk to me!) 18:37, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on Allen Edmonds, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Terrx 05:22, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Playing Away

[edit]

I have nominated Playing Away, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playing Away. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? LegoTech·(t)·(c) 03:18, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Arizonasqueeze! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 21 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 318 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Frank Sibley - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Steve Wicks - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Peter Hucker - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Ian Dawes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Gary Micklewhite - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Tony Hazell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. David Kerslake - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. Ron Hunt (footballer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  9. Keith Sanderson (footballer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  10. Ian Watson (footballer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 15:56, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:People from Blackheath

[edit]

Category:People from Blackheath, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]