User talk:AstronomicalPaper

This is AstronomicalPaper's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paranotaburmesebuthus (May 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anuwrites was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

could you add more context to it rather than a definition?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paranotaburmesebuthus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ANU^writes 23:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AstronomicalPaper! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ANU^writes 23:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Cold quasar[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cold quasar, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as MACS1149-JD1. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

QSO J1427+3312[edit]

It's good to have an article on this object, but a couple of corrections are needed. The statement that this is the most distant known radio-loud quasar was true when it was discovered but this isn't true any more. There are more distant examples known now such as this object. Also, it's incorrect to state that this object has a "temperature" of 10^7-10^8 K: this is the brightness temperature, which describes the intensity of the emitted radiation. Aldebarium (talk) 20:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: GS-9209 (galaxy) has been accepted[edit]

GS-9209 (galaxy), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ratnahastin (talk) 05:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]