User talk:Atif kakar2013

Speedy deletion nomination of Zarwali Afghan

Hello Atif kakar2013,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Zarwali Afghan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zarwali Afghan ‎ . Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:57, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zarwali Afghan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zarwali Afghan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:12, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zarwali Afghan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Zarwali Afghan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 05:38, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zarwali Afghan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zarwali Afghan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:13, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been re-created four times now. You will not be able to create it again. I suggest you work on this article in your sandbox, and contact an administrator for review and moving to main article space when you are satisfied that the article complies with Wikipedia:Notability and in particular WP:MUSICBIO. ~Amatulić (talk) 12:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article was created again - see below. smileguy91^talk 22:51, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's because it was re-created as lowercase. Deleted. And protected against creation. One more incident like this, and this account will be blocked indefinitely for disruption. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:24, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Zarwali afghan

A tag has been placed on Zarwali afghan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. smileguy91^talk 22:51, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replacement of project page with "Zarwali Afghan‏‏" writeup

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Wikipedia:Automatic edit summaries, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —David Levy 09:55, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reposting Zarwali Afghan with sockpuppet account

Using the account User:Atif kakar to repost Zarwali Afghan under the title Zarwali afghan wiki will not prevent you from being blocked for disruption. On the contrary, using a sockpuppet is another ground for blocking. —teb728 t c 07:04, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:21, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't re-post your article to your talk page either. If you abuse your talk page again for any reason other than to appeal your block, you will lose your access to your talk page also. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:25, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]