User talk:Atmnn

Welcome!

Hello, Atmnn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 18:16, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hi, just a quick note that users are expected to use only a single account, see WP:MULTIPLE. – Uanfala 12:18, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Ahimsa, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:39, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ahimsa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. TheFrog001 - Talk to me! 08:38, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ahimsa, you may be blocked from editing. Dan Koehl (talk) 08:37, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ahimsa. Shellwood (talk) 15:35, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Venkateswara Temple, Tirumala

Hello Atmnn, please no blog-links - see Wikipedia:Weblinks. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:34, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please stop disruptive edits agasthyathepirate (talk) 04:53, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 11:11, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Swami Nithyananda has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Swami Nithyananda was changed by Atmnn (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.938458 on 2017-08-30T13:21:54+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:21, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Venkateswara Temple, Tirumala

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Venkateswara Temple, Tirumala, you may be blocked from editing. agasthyathepirate (talk) 06:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Venkateswara Temple, Tirumala. agasthyathepirate (talk) 12:08, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Venkateswara Temple, Tirumala, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. agasthyathepirate (talk) 09:02, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

You keep adding claims that the Venkateswara Temple was originally a Jain temple, but you have yet to post a reliable source for this claim and have deleted tags asking for citations. Please read the wikipedia guidelines at Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and stop edit warring. Edward321 (talk) 14:04, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs are not reliable sources. Edward321 (talk) 14:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see, you have received another block for edit warring. You have repeatedly added the same claims without any attempt at discussion and without providing a reliable source for those claims. Please read the Wikipedia guidelines at Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Blogs are not reliable sources. Unless you can provide a reliable source for the claim that the Venkateswara Temple was originally a Jain temple, your edits will continue to be reverted and you will probably get progressively longer blocks. Edward321 (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm Muon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Venkateswara Temple, Tirumala have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. μ Talk 08:11, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Muon. Can you please block this person from the above mentioned page. Atleast twice a day, the edit needs to be reverted. Mutliple notifications have been given to the user, as u can see in the talk page. --}- Cyarenkatnikh (talk) 17:43, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 15:45, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. Katie^talk 15:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Venkateswara Temple, Tirumala shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 13:56, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Atmnn reported by User:Cpt.a.haddock (Result: ). Thank you. —Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 13:58, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 21:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]