User talk:Azure12

July 2009

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Screaming Tunnel. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 20:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blue Ghost Tunnel

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Blue Ghost Tunnel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article's subject is identical with an existing entry in the encyclopedia. See Merritton Tunnel. This article is unreferenced and redundant, in fact, a redirect already exists to the Merritton Tunnel article.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Deconstructhis (talk) 23:04, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Silver Run Tunnel

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Silver Run Tunnel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Brief unreferenced ghost story with no indication of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Deconstructhis (talk) 15:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sort-of-ponytail

I have nominated Sort-of-ponytail, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sort-of-ponytail. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Oscarthecat (talk) 11:02, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Blueboy 96 20:48, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Tale of Laughing in the Dark (Episode)

The article The Tale of Laughing in the Dark (Episode) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Info duplicated in List of Are You Afraid of the Dark? episodes.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tckma (talk) 18:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Tale of Laughing in the Dark (Episode)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is The Tale of Laughing in the Dark (Episode). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tale of Laughing in the Dark (Episode). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Trapped! Games - Floor 6

A tag has been placed on Trapped! Games - Floor 6 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. mhking (talk) 19:49, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Trapped! Games Floor 5

A tag has been placed on Trapped! Games Floor 5 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:15, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Book articles

I see you have created a number of articles about children's books. An encyclopaedia is interested primarily in the book in the real world - how it was received, how it came to be written etc. The actual content of the book is relatively unimportant. Please see WP:IINFO, particularly point 1. I42 (talk) 21:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Tale of the Quicksilver (Episode)

I have nominated The Tale of the Quicksilver (Episode), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tale of the Quicksilver (Episode). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 21:49, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Miss Gribble. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 19:17, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "The Hair Witch Project (The Worst Witch)"

A page you created, The Hair Witch Project (The Worst Witch), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it has no content, other than external links, categories, "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title, and/or chat-like comments.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Falcon8765 (talk) 17:20, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Just Like Clockwork (The Worst Witch)

A tag has been placed on Just Like Clockwork (The Worst Witch), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 19:23, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Just Like Clockwork (The Worst Witch), a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 19:36, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Worst Witch

Hi there. I notice you've created a few articles on the worst witch series. A lot of these have come under my radar when looking for uncategorised articles. I've created the Category:The Worst Witch for you. If you put the articles you have/will create in there, and perhaps create some subcategories, it might help them to grow. Declan Clam (talk) 02:47, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miss Crotchet

The article Miss Crotchet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fictional character that does not have enough notability to warrant a separate article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Miyagawa (talk) 17:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles about characters

Hi Azure12, I've noticed you've been creating a lot of articles about book and TV characters, often very minor ones. We generally don't have articles about every single character in a work, except for certain extremely important works like Hamlet. Minor characters in not-so-important works just don't have the notability for a stand-alone article. I hate to see you put in a lot of work on a dozen articles about The Worst Witch characters, for instance, only to have them all deleted or redirected to the main article. Just because something—a book character, a college dorm, a TV episode—exists does not mean it belongs in a whole separate article. Glenfarclas (talk) 00:42, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Earhart's Heirloom/Ancient Greeks

The article Earhart's Heirloom/Ancient Greeks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 22:03, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Earhart's Heirloom/Ancient Greeks

I have nominated Earhart's Heirloom/Ancient Greeks, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earhart's Heirloom/Ancient Greeks. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 22:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Earhart's Heirloom/Ancient Greeks

I have nominated Earhart's Heirloom/Ancient Greeks, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earhart's Heirloom/Ancient Greeks. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 22:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Earhart's Heirloom/Ancient Greeks. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. I42 (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Slave Girl (My Story). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bloody Tower (My Story)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Bloody Tower (My Story), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloody Tower (My Story). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Woogee (talk) 04:20, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Slave Girl (My Story)

I have nominated Slave Girl (My Story), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slave Girl (My Story). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 04:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of War Nurse (My Story)

I have nominated War Nurse (My Story), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War Nurse (My Story). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. AniMate 02:58, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop and try talking

You've created a surprising number of articles, and most if not all have been either deleted or redirected. One of the biggest reasons is that you've created articles without any references about subjects where references will be hard to find. Judging by the types of articles you're creating, I'm going to guess you are a younger user. I'm going to add one of our welcome templates underneath this. It gives some really useful links and will probably explain things so you have a better idea about how things work around here. If you have questions please come and ask me on my talk page.

Welcome!

Hello, Azure12, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! AniMate 03:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Last chance

Please stop making articles on subjects that aren't acceptable for Wikipedia. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked. Stop. AniMate 11:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Blue hair

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Blue hair. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue hair (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pink hair

The article Pink hair has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary/or a directory. Unreferenced article, impossible to make decisions on who to include to make a suitable article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chzz ► 08:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Pink hair, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. (Repeat of final warning) I42 (talk) 09:25, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Azure12, I just reverted the edit you made to Titanic (1997 film). Did you really mean to claim that Mamma Mia earned over 1.8 billion dollars? According to Box Office Mojo it was well less than that. Anyway, have a good day. SQGibbon (talk) 19:54, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Let's Fight It Together

The article Let's Fight It Together has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Short film of questionable notability. "Award-winning" claimed, but no references given. No references of any kind, no IMDB page listed.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 18:36, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Pixar villains

Please do not keep re-adding the incorrect spelling of "villain." It is not spelled "villian." ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 21:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop intentionally introducing misspellings into the above-referenced article and removing my tagging. Continuing to do so will eventually be treated as vandalism. Thank you. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 21:42, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Disney/DreamWorks feud

The article Disney/DreamWorks feud has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, potentially contentious WP:OR.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 23:08, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Disney/DreamWorks feud

I have nominated Disney/DreamWorks feud, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney/DreamWorks feud. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 09:57, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop and reconsider your editing

You seem to be very interested in Disney/Pixar films and have been making a lot of edits to related articles. However, the content you are adding ("Pixarfilm10 was the third film including Generic Actor after Pixarfilm2 and Pixarfilm4") is really not relevant, considering that the films usually feature a number of well-known actors, and misplaced, since the lead section is not the place for trivia.

Please, look over your talk page and consider whether the contributions you have been making so far are worthwhile or not. Wikipedia depends on the participation of everybody, but it doesn't mean that every piece of information or synthesised idea that people have should necessarily be included. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 22:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles . Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 23:06, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to List of Pixar films, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 18:19, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have filed a notice at ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 03:00, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Dear Azure12 You can see from your talk page that there have been a lot of concerns about your editing but I can see from your contributions that you have never edited an article talk page or user talk page to discuss these concerns. Wikipedia is a collaborative project that relies on volunteers to discuss issues and reach a consensus. It is disruptive for one editor to continue to insert questionable content into articles and refuse to discuss the issue with the editors who then have to tidy up after them. I have therefore removed your editing rights. This block is indefinite in the context of no specified time. All you need to do to be unblocked is to confirm that in future you will discuss any concerns over your edits with other editors. You can do this by leaving a message on your talk page in the form of {{unblock|your message here}} Spartaz ^Humbug! 03:54, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Pixar villains

The article List of Pixar villains has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced WP:OR. Subjects is not notable outside their movie pages.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 05:56, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]