User talk:BDavid3490

March 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to JACC has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: JACC was changed by BDavid3490 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964347 on 2018-03-21T22:51:03+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:51, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JACC (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ammarpad was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read about promotion and reliable sources. Provide references from independent reliable sources and write in neutral tone

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JACC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:JACC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–Ammarpad (talk) 06:00, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BDavid3490! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! –Ammarpad (talk) 06:00, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JACC (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

You can't cite Wikipedia on itself, please just WP:Wikilink other articles, don't cite them.

While you have *have* the DatPiff cites, they don't prove Notability because DP is just a distributor, not journalism. The HipHopDX article is good, you need more cites like that.

Also, don't cite Echelon's FB page unless it explicitly says something about JACC.

So to summarize, you really need to read WP:Notability (music) because your only really solid cite is HHDX and possibly the New Times.

The other big problem is you just reel out a bunch of info about him, then say "oh also he was covered in X, Y, Z publications". That's the opposite of what you want. You want instead to build the article based on the coverage in X, Y, and Z. We want to know what outside observers have documented about him and his significance, not just a list of the albums he put out.

Again, take a quick look at WP:Notability (music) and it will explain a lot.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JACC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:JACC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:JACC - additional edits

Hello BDavid3490, I've updated Draft:JACC, and have used a layout similar to the existing Allday page, if that makes sense. Feel free to reply here (using the edit button), or on my talk page. Hopefully after a bit more editing it will be approved! Cheers, S SunnyBoi (talk) SunnyBoi (talk) 15:59, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JACC (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JACC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:JACC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 05:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]