User talk:Babakathy/Archive 4
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Babakathy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 9 |
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Emmanuel ngara.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Emmanuel ngara.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:38, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
- Hello. A low resolution picture is fine is the person in the photograph is dead or a recluse or otherwise impossible/very difficult to photograph. Otherwise it generally won't be OK to use a press/promo picture unless they were famous for their appearance and it has now changed or if the picture shows a famous scene or something like that. This page tries to cover the main sorts of cases when it is usually OK or usually not OK to use a non-free picture. Hope this makes sense. If not, please let me know. All the best, Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:51, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm afraid it does. Many thanks for letting me know. Cheers, Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:59, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Funandtrvl (talk) 04:21, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
It exists now! (FYI in case you want to add your info from your outline.) Awickert (talk) 06:44, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, good to hear from you! Awickert (talk) 07:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Featured article
hi. good to see you back. what about bringing university of zimbabwe to featured article or at least good article? regards Part (talk) 20:42, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- Google hi, it seems a google search may work, best for fa. Part (talk) 21:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
The Lemba Hypothesis
Dear Professor Babakathy,
For some years, I have been engaged in research on the nature and origin of the Ancient Zimbabwean Civilization. It seems sensible to try and share with others the results of that work, and to invite comments and criticisms so as to expand and if necessary correct my views.
Thus, it would be constructive to add a link to my article – i.e. http://DLMcN.com/anczimb.html – from your page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Great-Zimbabwe-2.jpg … Can you please advise me what is the correct procedure for doing that?
This is unfortunately a very sensitive political topic, and it is true that in the past the Rhodesian Government was guilty of not discussing it in a rational, scientific manner – as Paul Sinclair mentions. But we do need to ensure that a similar "censorship" is not now being applied in the opposite direction.
In that regard, my website cites several books and articles on Ancient Zimbabwe which either fail to mention the (partly Semitic) Lemba tribe – whose homeland is now just south of the Limpopo – or else the writers completely misrepresent that community. Protocol and etiquette prompted me to contact those authors to invite suggestions for modifying my wording.
The "Lemba hypothesis" is of course the principal rival of the officially accepted "Shona theory" for the source of the Zimbabwean Civilization.
I have inquired from various academics exactly what they think constitutes "conclusive proof" that the Shona created that ancient civilization – and they point to the artefacts and huts which have been found in and around the various ruins. I ask why those could not have been placed there after the Shona crossed the Zambesi and expelled or absorbed the earlier inhabitants – but I have never received an answer.
Incidentally, I am not claiming that a Semitic connection has been demonstrated beyond all doubt – just that that are several unanswered questions which need to be addressed before we can regard the matter as completely settled. DLMcN (talk) 17:27, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:52, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Masvingo logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Masvingo logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:18, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Marondera.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Marondera.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:47, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Is this true or vandalism?
The University of Zimbabwe (UZ) in Harare, is the oldest and second largest from NUST university in Zimbabwe. Part (talk) 19:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Don't think it is true, reverted, thanks.Babakathy (talk) 15:33, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Template:Mbire District has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 15:02, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Template:Mbire District has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC)