User talk:BallPark2

Welcome!

Hello, BallPark2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ros0709 (talk) 18:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Colonizing the moon

A tag has been placed on Colonizing the moon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gromlakh (talk) 18:15, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Your recent edit to 1 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 1 (number). Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 1 (number) was changed by BallPark2 (c) (t) deleting 20706 characters on 2008-01-19T20:55:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:55, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to 1 (number) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop redirecting 1 (number) against consensus. Your changes are disruptive and you will be blocked from editing if you continue. Please discuss your proposed change on the appropriate talk pages first an obtain consensus before making any further changes to this (or related) articles. Thanks, Gwernol 21:05, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comcerns over your GNAA MfD nominations

Hello, BallPark2! I have concerns over the pages you are nomination for deletion. I do not know your intentions, and I am going to assume good faith on your part, but your actions are misguided. First, the procedural nomination of archived pages (i.e., old discussions about articles rather than the articles themselves) is not going to happen. Second, the topic of these nominations, GNAA, is old news. By revisiting these pages you are, either naively or purposefully, opening a can of worms. This is considered as disruptive. I would appreciate some feedback from you so we can come to some understanding regarding the accepted practices on Wikipedia. Please respond here, on your talk page, as I will add it to my watchlist. I look forward to hearing from you, regards. --12 Noon ^2¢ 18:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BallPark2, I echo these concerns. There is no policy-based reason to remove all of the GNAA-related pages. Your repeated nomination of pages is indeed becoming disruptive. If you continue you will find yourself blocked. Please stop. Thanks, Gwernol 18:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a final warning concerning your disruptive edits regarding GNAA. As your account is new, with no history of serious contributions, further disruption or tendentious editing on the subject of GNAA will subject this account to a long-term block. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 20:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He Lives

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article He Lives, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of He Lives. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 14:19, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have added sufficient to this article to protect it from deletion, but have left it labelled as a stub, so please add more. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Twelfty-billion pool

Wikipedia:Twelfty-billion pool, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Quintillion pool and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Twelfty-billion pool during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 03:31, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]