User talk:BarzanPDK18
Welcome!
[edit]
|
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kurdish National Congress of North America, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://kncna.org. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:03, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Kurdish National Congress of North America
[edit]A tag has been placed on Kurdish National Congress of North America requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PinkBull 03:08, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
March 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Kurdish National Congress of North America, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. PinkBull 03:19, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Kurdish National Congress of North America. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PinkBull 03:29, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BarzanPDK18 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 12:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. You have been blocked as a sockpuppet per WP:DUCK. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BarzanPDK20 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 01:48, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RojNews18 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 19:08, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Musicalboy16 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 06:02, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nationalist16 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 06:19, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ReginaKid2010 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 01:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ZilanLover16 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 21:24, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/207.47.163.102 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 22:14, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Centralboy for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 03:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scienceboy26 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 05:03, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MySuperTV for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 23:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BarzanPDK18, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.