Jump to content

User talk:Beckjord

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the user talk page of an editor who has died.
This user is a Bigfootophile. Is this how you want it? Just leave out the plus sign. Bishonen.

Welcome!

PAGE CLEANUP

[edit]

Please do not revert this page. It was too long and too full of nonsense.

I will be out of town on an expedition for some time, and will have only rare access to the internet.

Thanks, leave it be.

Beckjord

beckjordBeckjord 18:46, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keypad

[edit]

Is your keypad acting up ? This may explain some typos. I had to toss a keypad, after accidentally spilling a coffee in it. That thing smoked and sparked all over the place, almost starting a fire. Martial Law 02:27, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked

[edit]

It took about three minutes to prove conclusively that 205.208.227.49 is you. You have been blocked for 48 hours for threats and disruption on Talk:Bigfoot. -Bishonen | talk 21:11, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alien

[edit]

I've done some Google Searches on Bigfoot and aliens, and have found some incident reports that state that UFOs may actually "beam" these creatures on to this planet and remove them. You yourself have a pix of one in a UFO. I have seen one incident report in which a witness was taken over by some kind of alien intelligence and started acting like a Bigfoot. Sometimes the UFO is seen in the same area that Bigfoot is seen in. In other incident reports, UFOs are seen deploying these things and retrieving them by witnesses, who have shot at both the UFOs and the creatures. Do a Google Search, and you'll see what I'm referring to.

I've also been doing some Google Searches on Cruithne, our second moon. Some people believe that this thing is a UFO. Reason for this is that it and some other asteroids have recently taken odd orbiting positions around Earth. Martial Law 22:22, 14 January 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

[edit]

This link is: This link is about YOU

Thought you ought to see this. Martial Law 22:39, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does this link belong to you ? Martial Law 22:43, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've found this lying about in cyberspace. Martial Law 06:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go to the article Flying humanoids to see a NEW cryptid, and go to Jeff Rense's Homepage: Click on any "Flying Humanoids" article to see any and all videotapes of these things. One appears to be a flying Bigfoot or Yeti seen on a videotape. Martial Law 22:52, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you may want to know that the article 'Flying humanoids is up for deletion. The reason for article deletion is claims of "original research(i.e. conspiracy theory and Bigfoot nuts)" Go to the Deletion template, then go to where it says "this article's entry" to get to the discussion/project page. Vote to KEEP, since it discribes one or more new cryptids that have been videotaped in Mexico and in the US.

Wait until your current block has expired to vote on this matter. Martial Law 00:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

Before you do any voting at all, contact a Admin. to show you how this is done, and you only have ONE vote per discussion, poll,etc.

One other thing, you really do have to be civil at all times and, like me, you will have to follow Wikipedian Protocol. Otherwise you may end up being tossed out. Martial Law 06:50, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This may help

[edit]

See Demon. Martial Law 21:56, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sign designation

[edit]

All you have to do to "sign" your name is only use 3 ~ s or 4 ~ s. The programming then uses the ~ s to "sign" your name. 3 ~ s get this: Martial Law, while 4 ~ s get this: Martial Law 22:58, 15 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Its automatic. Martial Law 22:58, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This means you don't have to do this: Martial LawMartial Law at all. Martial Law 23:02, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have this each and every time: Martial Law or Martial Law 23:07, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

everytime you type in 3 ~ s or 4 ~ s, and just these symbols to sign your online designation. Martial Law 23:07, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go to this link, then click on Alien Contact Files. There are Bigfoot-like creatures reported on this link. The link is UFO Casebook Homepage:Click on "Alien Contact Files" This will take you to a list that is catagorized in years, such as "2001". Click on any year listed to see the UFO/Alien/Cryptid related incident reports. Martial Law 23:21, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This link referred to also has a "Alien Encounter Classification chart", such as one in which the alien was killed by military personnel. Cheers. :) Martial Law 23:25, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good reason to be civil

[edit]

Here is a really good reason to be civil and follow Wikipedian protocol: Imagine that you, yes, YOU as a Admin. That position has a lot of power and a lot of responsibility that goes with it. There are other ranks that are higher than a sysop as well. Wikipedia is like the military in a way. Right now, you and I are like the Privates and the PFCs, while the Admins are like Sergeants, then you have the higher ranks, until you get to the Boss himself, who is Jimbo Wales, who is like a General, who tells the lower ranks what to do.

Hope this helps. Martial Law 05:19, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Were you in the military and/or were you a "military brat" ? Martial Law 05:21, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox

[edit]

Hey I added the Bigfoot box to your userpage. If you don't like it, just delete it. --DanielCD 08:05, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Civil

[edit]

User:Beckjord, you really have to be civil at all times. I have not lied to you, am not lying to you, will not lie to you. One other thing, do you know these people ?

See this link:Sasquatch Odyssey Homepage. Martial Law 02:36, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of this site: Bigfoot Sightings. This one has data of what it is like if someone were to kill a Bigfoot. Is this site garbage ? Martial Law 05:46, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration

[edit]

I have filed a request for arbitration regarding your behavior on Bigfoot and related articles. Please make a statement in the appropriate section. android79 22:49, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just seen this / Plea

[edit]

Just seen this matter. This can go really bad for you. You could:

  • End up Banned.
  • End up under parole.
  • End up under enforced mentorship, as if the voluntary version is'nt strict enough.
  • End up blocked indefinately.
  • End up blocked for at least a month.

This is Wikipedia's version of Court. To help rectify this matter, I am strongly urging you to humbly and sincerely call off any and all wars you have going on against Wikipedia, initiate no more of these, there are means of handling disputes on Wikipedia, to humbly and sincerely apologise to those that have been insulted. In a nutshell, you have to take a bitter pill the size of bigfoot, and just maybe, maybe, these people will withdraw their "Request for Arbitration" against you.

Just as I have to, you will have to follow Wikipedian protocol. You have the ball. Will you make a touchdown or "fumble" the ball ?

If it is decided that you're placed under a enforced mentorship and/or parole, you'll be placed under a experienced Wikipedian, since I've been here for less than 4 months, and you could literally get anyone to oversee you as a mentor or end up under one or more Wiki-parole officers. In a parole situation, you are closely monitored, and it is similar to what a convict on parole has to endure, only that with Wikipedia, you may ask questions.

Under either system, you will have to be civil at all times. Its better than being banned, thrown off Wikipedia, better than being blocked every time you turn around.

All they're asking for is that you do not violate Wikipedian protocol at all, and verify what you are trying to state about Bigfoot and/or other cryptids, and that you are to be civil at all times. I've done repeated Google Searches on what you're stating, and there is evidence out there of what you're saying. Yes, independent evidence that states that these things are alien, may use some kind of interdimensional gateway and/or are brought to this Earth by alien influences, surprising evidence that these things are seen as demons by religious fundamentalists, seen as some kind of spirit guide by the New Agers. Some of the UFO websites and data sites, such as UFO Casebook has a list of UFO/Alien Contact files, and some of these refer to Bigfoot creatures, La Chupacabra creatures, other really bizarre creatures, as does Malevolent Alien Abduction Research: Alien Species or Alien Races.

Really hope this helps. :)

I have NOT lied to you, will not lie to you at all. Martial Law 18:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

Arbitration #2

[edit]

Hello Beckjord. If you would like to make a comment at the arbitration, I will help you phrase it and format it as needed. I would like to know what you think about the matter, so please leave me a message when you get the chance. --DanielCD 15:05, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

asked him

[edit]

He says he is innocent, and really does not care about any kangaroo court.

Big Annies Dog

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

NEW READERS TAKE NOTE

[edit]

There is a war going on between numbskulls and friends and supporters of Beckjord and his efforts to UPDATE the Bigfoot page. The numbskulls sit up all night waiting to un-edit comments made by the WAFE Bigfoot page editors, and there are more of them, mindless pedants.

So, to see the GOOD STUFF, click on the HISTORY PAGE TAB ABOVE, and look at the past editions of this page, (also Bigfoot article page, and Bigfoot discussion page)like going back, to view what the numbskulls covered up. You see, in Wikipedial, any new idiot, can UNDO all the improvements made over hrs, by one click. That is why Wikipedia is absurd, and is not respected by scholars, and journalists.

Daddy Warbucks Driver.

Etiquette and Civility

[edit]

Well, well I would strongly suggest that you take a moment and read about Etiquette and Civility here on Wikipedia. If you can not play nic-nice then you shouldn't be posting, making comments, or even logging on here at all. And as always, have a wonderful and happy day. MarcusTCicero 14:07, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you handle...

[edit]

Do you still handle field reports ? Fouke, Arkansas has had a incident with a Bigfoot, and still has problems with a bigfoot from time to time. Last known report was in 2004. Everytime this thing is spotted, these people grab some guns, ammo, dogs, beer/whiskey and go hunting this thing. Martial Law 21:18, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

>>> People with guns, dogs, whiskey etc, simply are wasting their time. If you know them, tell them this. Better off watching tv and relaxing. No guns work, no dogs will follow Bigfoot, and hunting BF is impossible.

Tell them, tell them, tell them.

BillyBobJoe

See the article The Legend of Boggy Creek, which is based on what happened when this thing made its first appearance. I have a DVD copy of this documentary. When dogs were set against it, the dogs would not go after it, when fired upon by witnesses, it acted like it had no effect, and it did attack two of the witnesses. Martial Law 06:15, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This could prove that this thing or one like it is immune to gunfire. Martial Law 06:23, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

fixation

[edit]

You have a fixation on Fouke.

Drop it.

foxy loxy.

Re.: Fouke

[edit]

This area has repeated encounters with this thing or many like it. You want the locals there to have your contact data, so that you can examine this case ? They don't like skeptics, since they've implied that skeptics have called them liars and idiots. Martial Law 21:32, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Email to/from EB

[edit]

He says yes, reports are always good, and the BIRO group can send in field investigators in some cases, but what is needed and wanted is not just another 100 sighting reports, but films, or videos or stills. If Bigfoot crossed the road, near Fouke, well, so what? What is needed, even there, is blood, hairs, bones, skulls, bodies, films and photos. What is REALLY needed, is habituation cases where repeat contacts are made near a farm or ranch or cabin, on an on-going basis, (no guns involved). Bigfoot is seen at least once a week, it is claimed, somewhere in the USA, if not more often. UNreported sightings are probably once per day.

Re skeptics, you understand that skeptics will not spend a dime to go anywhere, do you understand? Thus there is no chance in Hell that a skeptic will wander into Fouke, saying skeptical things to people who do not like skeptics.So relax, ML, relax.

BillyBob

I've personally investigated the incident, thus is how I know the people don't like skeptics, will go out looking for this thing armed everytime it is seen by someone, be it a local or a tourist. Martial Law 06:04, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quote re arbitration

[edit]

by email Beckjord says that if admins will properly and legally enter some of the sources and quotes he has for the Bigfoot page, that this will help create peace.

The goal, he says, is after all, to create GOOD articles, is it not?

loxy

Map

[edit]

See the Fouke, Arkansas article to locate the city itself, and if you or your people go there, do not insult these people at all. All have bad tempers and guns, knives when they feel slighted at all. Martial Law 06:09, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you..

[edit]

Do you or your people know of a Smokey Crabtree ? If not, go to this link:

Smokey's book on the Fouke Monster Martial Law 06:32, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crabtree

[edit]

This person has no evidence. No credibility. Generally ignored, except by AK people and ML. :-)

visitor

Who's "Foxy Loxy"

[edit]

Who is this person ? Martial Law 04:11, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedian Protocol

[edit]

There are ways of settling disputes on Wikipedia, and it stays on Wikipedia. Martial Law 04:14, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I said that I will let you know if something is "up". I am doing so, now. You have to lay off of the insults, disrespect of other editors. I am being truthful with you, have been truthful with you, will continue to be truthful with you. As I have indicated, there is INDEPENDENT evidence out there that does favor your view of this creature. Do a Google search of these:

If you must use a website, use one of the other ones that do indeed confirm what you are saying.

By the way, I've did a Google Search on you, found nearly 40,000 websites and data sites that mention "Erick Beckjord". Again, lay off the incivility, insults and disrespect. You are right, millions are now comming to Wikipedia to see what has been going on. It's now ranked 34th on the 'net. Martial Law 04:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As noted on BF page-talk - hits on Bigfoot page

[edit]

What is the estimate of hits daily on Wikipedia, and of these, what is the best estimate for the Bigfoot article. Please use your talents in using search engines to try to find this out, as best you can. Then post info. This will be a good service to us all.

visitor

Wikipedia has a estimated 50M hits per day. Most could be for the Bigfoot Article. Martial Law 21:13, 24 January 2006 (UTC) The Bigfoot article has a estimated 10,000 hits a day. Saw all of this on a Google Search. Martial Law 21:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC) :) YOU have a estimated 10,003 hits a day on your own site. Cheers. :) Martial Law 21:32, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note re Millions" now coming to view

[edit]

If there was NO conflict, and no edit war, those "millions"

WOULD NOT COME HERE.

Big smile..... do you get it????

Controversy sells! MAKES WIKI FAMOUS.

Visitor

OWE VOTE OF THANKS TO ANDROID79, DREAMGUY, GRAPESBOY, AND OTHERS

[edit]

By acting as cops, you stimulate reponse and conflict, and this is GOOD because it brings in more people to view article.

Thanks!

Visitor

Hi visitor! I'm glad you found Wikipedia. I'll have to introduce you to Beckjord. --DanielCD 22:13, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Beckjord. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Beckjord/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Beckjord/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Kelly Martin (talk) 01:20, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NEW CASE

[edit]

Please go to this link that is encl. here. A guy has taken a pix of something that looks like one of your aliens or Bigfoot creatures. The link is:Alien Bigfoot

This is from a mountainous section of the US. The incident report is also here as well. Martial Law 02:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is this thing ?

Martial Law 02:10, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin problems

[edit]

The truth is out there. I want to believe.

Having problems with the Admin? I'd like to read all about it. --Masssiveego 09:16, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Try Android79, and DreamGuy

[edit]

<personal attack removed>

beckjord205.208.227.49 23:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beckjord, one more crack like that and I lock this page. Tenk på saken. Bishonen | talk 04:11, 28 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]

YOU ARE BEAUTIFUL WHEN YOU ARE ANGRY

[edit]

Cute girl.

BeckjordBeckjord 06:19, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Beckjord, while I do not buy into any of your bigfoot theories, I think they are legitimate as a minority POV, linkable. I came here because of the attacks of DreamBoy on you - if he attacks you, you can't be all bad, can you? ;)

You should be aware of the fact that while maintaining the upper hand for their "MyPOV" seems to be a more or less legitimate hobby for some 'editors', starting edit wars on Wikipedia is not. Sending a call to arms on your website, to fight Wikipedia editors, isn't either, no matter how much you dislike them (or how much I might regard them with suspicion).

So please - if you want your point to be made, let others do it for you. Or try to get into the way Wikipedia is handled and disputes are to be phrased. The former seems easier than the latter. Just my 2cts. Gwyndon 12:10, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Guess I will start a WIKI forum

[edit]

for upset Wikians. There we will hear the REAL TRUTH. The secret lore of Wiki.

Hehehehe.

beckjordBeckjord 06:19, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Independent Evidence ?

[edit]

See this link:Bigfoot Vanishing Martial Law 03:50, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Enjoy
Martial Law 03:52, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you could ask George Noory and the original photog who shot the "alien pix",
so that you can place it on your website. Martial Law 21:07, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you can also link the "Vanishing Bigfoot" link to your site as well. Martial Law 21:09, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're blocked again

[edit]

I don't think the editors have to tolerate your onging personal insults as shown when you called everyone "idiots" [1]. I've blocked you for 24 hours, so take this time to read throughly about no personal attacks--MONGO 06:48, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tell the truth

[edit]

Although you,MOngo, might not be one of them.

You really take all this S&&t seriously, don't you.

beckjordBeckjord 06:10, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Statement to the court

[edit]

I have read NPOV and other pages, and I will try to use the rules as best I can.

beckjordBeckjord 06:10, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And again

[edit]

... for 3RR on Bigfoot. Your current AOL IP (what a courageous choice) is blocked too. Bishonen | talk 21:38, 30 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Oh my

[edit]

How terrible.... and what aol ip?

You are now blocking innocent aol users.

Thanks for the tulip.

We should have a date.

Dinner for two.

beckjordBeckjord 06:13, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New info.

[edit]

I will attempt a E-mail test real shortly. Been told to not "blow" a ongoing investigation. Can't get into it right now. One of those involved in a certain incident is in a sensitive position. It is one thing to make a civilian, such as us, look like idiots. Can't do that with a soldier. I am near a USAF "Command Base", who gets their orders from the Pentagon itself. I'm also near a US Army installation as well. These people don't like their personnel reporting bizarre matters in a public manner. I'm also near a FBI installation as well, and these personnel definately don't like people openly reporting bizarre material. Someone living near one of these military installations has seen a crop circle in property that has woody weeds in it, and the area has also reported a Bigfoot. One has to deal with this matter delicately as possible. In the case of the crop circle, one can rule out a hoax, due to the nature of the woody plants. As to the Bigfoot incident, it like walking in a minefield. Martial Law 00:31, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When certain people tell you to (polite) jump, you just do it, not even asking "how high ?". You do not(polite) mess with these personnel. Martial Law 00:34, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ML

[edit]
I am sure they are reading everything you post here in public.

BeckjordBeckjord 06:12, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As stated, they can make us look like idiots, crazies and worse, but can't do that with a soldier. Read the Robertson Panel article and/or post a copy of this article on your website. It explains why people do not report bizarre matters.

It states that the psychiatrists are also used - to obviously make people appear to be crazy or worse. Enjoy. Also do a Google search on this:"Robertson Panel" as well to get more information. Martial Law 02:58, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New online discussion forum on Wiki events and people

[edit]

http://www.network54.com/Forum/170755/

beckjordBeckjord 06:34, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


What garbage I am reading on the Kangaroo Kourt page on me

[edit]

He has used articles, talk pages and edit comments to make severe accusations of criminal wrongdoing against experts in the field of Bigfoot studies who he disagrees with. \

No

[edit]

I simply state the truth, with evidence. Loren Coleman is an admitted thief.

It is well known. It is not made up. http://www.beckjord.com/bigfoot/coleman.html

Go see the documents he signed for cash. 1/29/06

BeckjordBeckjord 06:41, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Like in this example, where he accused a man of theft and not knowing what he's talking about in an effort to remove a link to an essay from Loren Coleman, who is widely considered one of the top(if not the top) experts on the topic.

Bottom of the barrel

[edit]

Loren Coleman is only expert on writing really bad books.

He is NOT respected. People walk out of his lectures.

beckjordBeckjord 06:41, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this change was the exact same change he originally made in the edit I linked to previously. It's a month and a half and he's still fighting to remove it despite lacking support for the change from any other editor. He has also accused another author of libel more than once in order to justify removing her book from the list of sources. These kinds of accusations are quite problematic and should not be entered here by anyone for legal reasons.

Do not need other editors

[edit]

None of you are knowledgeable in the topic.

BeckjordBeckjord 06:41, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tried to post my defense on court page

[edit]

But I am blocked.

The prisoner was asked his defense and could not speak due to the tape over his mouth.

At least Saddam gets to speak.

beckjordBeckjord 06:43, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, boo hoo. It's quite common that people under arbitration are blocked (see, there are sometimes reasons that they're under arbitration). They use e-mail. You can e-mail any arbitrator. This page contains a list of arbitrators and links to their e-mails. Use any one of them to post your defense. The arbitrator you mail to will put it on the page for you. Bishonen | talk 10:57, 31 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]

never heard of anything this stupid before

[edit]

Except in US Gov't.

Totally absurd. Catch 22. No longer care.

beckjordBeckjord 09:27, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Post Defense here

[edit]

Post defense here. Will try to locate Admin DanielCD. He'll post it for you. Martial Law 07:19, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just contacted Admin. DanielCD for you. Better yet, wait until this block is over, then post your defense, and please keep it civil. Hope this helps. Martial Law 07:26, 31 January 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

How long are you blocked this time ? Martial Law 07:46, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Martial Law, I know you're trying to help, but Beckjord should submit his defense by e-mail like I say above. There's no need for him to wait. Bishonen | talk 10:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Guys, I think it's a little late in the game now. You're just going to have to live with what comes. --DanielCD 16:57, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Subject:Loren Coleman

[edit]

There are 161,000 websites and data sites dedicated to this subject. Thought you might want to know. Martial Law 07:32, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Coleman sites

[edit]

Yes, and most hate his guts.

sandy

New law in US

[edit]

Please see the article Internet troll, Re.:Prison term for trolling. Thought you may want to know this. Prez Bush has very recently signed this legislation into law. Fines are servere, and there is a two (2) YEAR prison term for being a internet troll. See the links in the article's discussion page or ask a Admin. for more info. Martial Law 10:08, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Law

[edit]

Unconstitutional.

Also, based on my experience with death threats by email and phone, the perp has to do it hundreds of times, to the same person, not a group, before the feds will act.

sandysan

Community Bulletin Board

[edit]

I need all of your contact info. for this. The place I'm currently located has a Community Bulletin Board. Do you want your contact info. placed there ? Martial Law 21:12, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration status

[edit]

Current status: Voting.

Hopefully, they'll allow you to stay on this format under a mentorship program.
You did
request assisstance in the past, and you are doing well to "mend fences". Martial Law 02:30, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
IF you are placed in a enforced mentorship program, you and your personnel are to be CIVIL at all times and will have to follow the mentors' suggestions. You may only ask questions of them. This is a lot better than being tossed out. Most on this program may end up as Admins themselves, since they kept themselves clean. Of course, some foul up royally and get tossed. Call it Wikipedia Boot camp, just like a military "Boot Camp". As for the socks that some people claim you have, explain the situation about other people using your computer. You did state that you often go to a public establishment, a "coffeeshop" that has "pro-bigfooters" in it. Give the name of the coffeeshop. Martial Law 03:26, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Harold's Coffeeshop

[edit]

As for the vote, etc, I think they just should close down my username Beckjord, because I have no respect for most of them and just do not give a damn. IMHO, Wikipedia is a joke. Anyone who does 7,000 edits and is proud to go on "New Page Patrol" has to be a total fool and idiot, and I accept no restrictions from fools and idiots. If you do not see the """maniac""" """circus""" this is, then I am sorry for you. I'm going skiing.

beckjordBeckjord 09:22, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't leave. Things will get boring. Martial Law

This is what you need: Wikipedia:Boot camp at first, then, WP:Mentorship. Hope this helps. Martial Law 03:31, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disaster

[edit]
Have 4 seperate places set up to keep your records safe from any future disaters, such as a fire, earthquake, even war. Martial Law 07:17, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Even the BIG companies are now doing this to protect their records since the September 11th Attacks happened. Martial Law 07:27, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tons of articles

[edit]

This has tons of articles in this link:Tons of Newspaper, Magazine articles about Bigfoot. See RE.:"Bugs" Texas Bigfoot Carcasses. a guy who may call himself "Bugs" allegedly shot and killed two (2) bigfoot creatures. He told this to Art Bell while Coast To Coast AM was The Art Bell Show. Click on the article itself in the link. Have you heard this show ? I have long ago. Martial Law 08:10, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Total bullshit

[edit]

trust no one.

Bugs never proved anything.

Beckjord 09:25, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Beckjord is NOT being uncivil at all here. I've heard "Bugs" myself on Coast To Coast AM myself, when it was "The Art Bell Show" Martial Law 19:54, 2 February 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

There are more articles on the link to examine. Martial Law 19:56, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See RE.:Krantz as well in the list of articles. :) Martial Law 20:03, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look, Martial Law

[edit]

I know most of the players and most of the better sites, and get this - "Bigfoot is not proven and probably never will be". Does not matters who saw what, or who said what. There are no bones and no bodies, and no proof. That is the bottom_line and your html stuff in wiki does not work.

So posting all these sites is interesting, but will not prove Bigfoot.

Beckjord


Now you know why people are trying to kill one. What about that blood sample that you had mentioned ? How was it obtained ? That was why I asked in the discussion about someone shooting one. Martial Law 23:12, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In my current location, people do shoot and kill intruders. Why is it that other people don't get this ? Martial Law 23:18, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can't kill

[edit]

Not possible. Waste of time to even try.

Beckjord 18:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Sandbox

[edit]

This is for the errors, and other "unmentionables". I'm surprised that no one told you about this. Have fun. it is WP:SB Martial Law 04:18, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blackworm

[edit]

Be wary of this bug until it can be terminated. It is in attachments. See the article Blackworm for more. This thing can turn a $1,000 computer into a $1,000 paperweight.

You don't want this thing around at all. If you have a good firewall, use it, or it may destroy your tech systems, taking you down.

Just when I thought it was safe to use E-mail. Whoever created it needs to see the inside of Club FED for the next 100 yrs. We'll have to keep things public, until this worm is terminated. YUCK. That thing is a act of terrorisim. Martial Law 09:21, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do what I can on my end. Best option is to keep our E-mails short and to the point, so there are no attachments, bulk mess, anything that will trigger our computers' defensive protocol. Hate this too. Martial Law 09:24, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Honey Island Monster Researcher

[edit]

Do you know the person who has this E-mail ?

E-mail is: dana@cedesigns.com

She is selling books and other material about this monster. Martial Law 19:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some people's pages are frozen

[edit]

Hmm, new to Wiki, so I wonder, is this a bad thing, to have to freeze your page, or an article, from edits by newbies? It is good? Bad? Or neutral?

What say old timers?

visiting clown.

Skeptical Inquirer

[edit]

What do you think of this "magazine" ? Martial Law 06:17, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Debunker's magazine

[edit]

Full of blind prejudice.

However,

  "50% of all the CSICOP skeptics who went on bigfoot camping trips, became believers."
                            
                                     Jon-Erik Beckjord

Beckjord

Quote

[edit]

"Wikipedia,an encyclopedia where any 8 year old child can edit, but shouldn't."

                      Jon-Erik Beckjord

Bigfoot HOSTILE

[edit]

See this link, then RE.:Are They Dangerous. Bigfoot attacks 3, kills one person Martial Law 07:42, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hunting Magazine: Hunting Bigfoot

[edit]

Hunting Bigfoot Martial Law 08:08, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trust no stories without proof

[edit]

Beckjord

Bigfoot page looking far better

[edit]

Thanks to all who assisted on this arduous endeavour. All for the improvement of Wikipedia.

Beckjord

Miss you

[edit]

I miss you Beck...you should have been a poet! Seriously...

I cleaned up the Cheshire cat caption at the article. --DanielCD 21:54, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tanks

[edit]

Beckjord

Understand this about what was happening

[edit]

It was messy, and I raised enough hell to get noticed and hassled and banned, but out of it, some good edits happened and some good people came along and helped make the edits stick, using approved Wiki techniques, so now the article (Bigfoot) is more accurate, which was my goal in the first place.

IT WORKED!!!!!

BTW, I am a poet, a writer, a filmmaker, a lover and philosopher.

Also, now working on screenplay for docudrama on Bigfoot, and Wikians who use real names and have BF experiences may be in the film-for-tv. I'll be interviewing a lady who was rescued by Bigfoot at age 5, a man who filmed disappearing tracks in snow, a woman who meditates nude in the snow and has a worm-hole portal in her yard in the woods and more.

Beckjord

Request of DanielCD

[edit]

Please change title name of named article from Erik Beckjord to Jon-Erik Beckjord, which is my complete name.

Can do? I think this is reasonable.\

Beckjord

Done. --DanielCD 14:15, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]