User talk:Binthaneya

August 2013

Hello, I'm Ryan032. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Burj Khalifa, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -Ryan 06:09, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Burj Khalifa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -Ryan 06:20, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Burj Khalifa

I can not see any reason to remove the information in the "Labour controversy" section.. If you feel that there are inaccuracies, please fix them and cite your sources or discuss it on the talk page. Do not remove sections without substantial reasoning. -Ryan 06:22, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't smear the name of my country with your propaganda! i do not discuss on here, only on twitter @binthaneya

Please see Wikipedia:Blanking sections sometimes violates policies. It is not acceptable to remove sections of articles because of your point of view. There is nothing that appears to be incorrect or false (all sources are cited) in that section. -Ryan 06:36, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Discussion

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -Ryan 07:08, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR - do not edit war!

Please be advised about WP:3RR, our strict rule limiting editors to no more than 3 reverts per 24 hour period. Please also note that this is not an entitlement, edit warring is frowned upon in general, and will lead to you being blocked from editing. You have already violated the 3RR rule on Burj Khalifa. If you have good reasons, please explain them on the articles talk page, talk:Burj Khalifa. Pointing to Twitter, of all venues, is not helpful. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:38, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Binthaneya. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Burj Khalifa, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —Ryulong (琉竜) 07:47, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at The Dubai Mall. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. See the block list for more blocks.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 08:14, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

- Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! I had to revert one of your recent edits to Human rights in Dubai as you did not explain why you removed the content fro the article. We know that it was done in good faith, and I hope this does not discourage you from editing Wikipedia. Again, welcome. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 04:44, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -- [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 05:17, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm NGPriest. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Burj Khalifa, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NGPriest was here (talk | contribs) 05:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Human rights in the United Arab Emirates. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Human rights in the United Arab Emirates was changed by Binthaneya (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966874 on 2013-08-12T05:31:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:31, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:32, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Burj Khalifa. NGPriest was here (talk | contribs) 05:34, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued edit warring, violations of neutral point of view, soapboxing, and disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:38, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]