Jump to content

User talk:Bpavithr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Bpavithr, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Samhi.C, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Festucalextalk 08:47, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Samhi.C, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Festucalextalk 08:47, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the review. I have rewritten the page with neutral point of view. Bpavithr (talk) 10:30, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samhi.C (August 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Actualcpscm were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Actualcpscm (talk) 10:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Bpavithr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Actualcpscm (talk) 10:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Samhi.C, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 12:14, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Bpavithr. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bpavithr. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bpavithr|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Actualcpscm (talk) 12:24, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Im not being compensated directly or indirectly on this. This is not at all paid advocacy. I tried to put the factual information that can be verified and presented in a neutral point of view. This is my first article and would love to improve on my mistakes paid in the page. Please advise me on how to improve and proceed further. Bpavithr (talk) 12:31, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Thanks for your interest in contributing to Wikipedia, it‘s very much appreciated.
Writing for Wikipedia is quite difficult. The issue with the current draft is that it‘s full of personal opinions and unsourced (positive) judgements of the subject and their work. It‘s almost all WP:FLUFF. Content on WP needs to be written from a neutral point of view, which that draft is not. Everything, every specific claim (particularly about living people) needs to be verifiable. That means readers need to be able to check that it‘s true. This is accomplished by providing reliable sources for such claims. Most of the draft is currently unsourced, which means that no reliable source of information was provided for the claims it makes. In particular, the opinions and judgements in it are not attributed to reliable sources and thus unacceptable. (Amazon reviews are not reliable sources because anyone can write whatever they want there; see WP:UGC.)
Writing an article from scratch is really difficult, and there‘s a lot more to consider that I haven‘t mentioned here. It‘s usually better for newcomers to start with other tasks, like copyediting existing articles.
If you need some starting pointers, or you‘d like help with rewriting the draft, feel free to let me know. I‘d be happy to help you with any questions or concerns :) Actualcpscm (talk) 12:55, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samhi.C (August 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:55, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 13:24, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Samhi.C, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Qcne (talk) 14:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Samhi.C

[edit]

Hi @Bpavithr.

I see you've attempted to submit this draft three times, and it has already been deleted twice as unambiguous advertising written in a way that is incompatible with Wikipedia. Unfortunately I believe your third attempt at this is likely to be deleted or rejected for the same reason.

If you'd like some assistance with creating a Wikipedia article for the first time, you can either ask here or at Wikipedia:Teahouse. I would also strongly recommend you read the following before you attempt to create this draft again:

- Wikipedia:Your first article which gives you the dos and don'ts of creating an article.

- Wikipedia:Five pillars which detail the fundamental principles of Wikipedia.

Let me know if you have any questions and I'd be happy to help,

Best, Qcne (talk) 14:33, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samhi.C (August 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Actualcpscm was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Actualcpscm (talk) 14:42, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Again, if you'd like help with this, please let me know. Actualcpscm (talk) 14:42, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Samhi.C

[edit]

Hello, Bpavithr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Samhi.C".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 14:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]