User talk:Braeden90000

January 2018

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Corvus— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:40, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. . Lakeside Out!-LakesideMiners^{Click Here To Talk To Me!} 14:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gladys Kathleen Parkin, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Gladys Kathleen Parkin was changed by Braeden90000 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85586 on 2018-02-01T14:54:14+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gladys Kathleen Parkin. . Lakeside Out!-LakesideMiners^{Click Here To Talk To Me!} 14:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:34, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Braeden90000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m sorry I’m just a kid Braeden90000 (talk) 20:36, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Thanks for letting us know you aren't mature enough yet. Once you feel you are mature enough, and not sooner than six months from now, please consider requesting the block be lifted. You'll need to convince us you have sufficiently matured over that time. Good luck! Yamla (talk) 20:42, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hey

It's been a few months can I be unblocked? Braeden90000 (talk) 16:30, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously not, no. --Yamla (talk) 16:45, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

Could I please be unblocked it’s been like a year. Braeden90000 (talk) 04:50, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Braeden90000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m more mature now and would like to be unblocked please.Braeden90000 (talk) 04:55, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Scott (talk) 19:28, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Could you give us some examples of what sort of edits you'd like to make if you were unblocked please? O Still Small Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) 07:31, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would maybe fix grammar errors or important information

Can you be more specific than that? GAB^gab 02:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]