User talk:Brockmanah

Welcome!

Hello, Brockmanah, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! karmafist 23:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stubs

Please don't create place holder articles which contain no content. If you have nothing to say right now, please wait until you do. User:Zoe|^(talk) 03:47, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

moved from main page

See Talk:Sir William Brockman. Tearlach 23:54, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've just been skimming some of the Brockman articles you've added. These really do need better sourcing: unpublished material and personal correspondence aren't considered sufficiently authoritative sources. Wikipedia requires that material be "previously published by a reputable publisher".

Where the source is an out-of-print text, as I said elsewhere, the guideline Wikipedia:Don't include copies of primary sources applies (see, for instance, Virginia Cavaliers (historical)). I'm a little troubled about the copyright situation also: although the original text is out of copyright, a transcription may be; and it's a cut&paste from [1] at Kathy Leigh's www.usahistory.info site. Tearlach 00:54, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brockmanah, would you please answer my question at Talk:James Brockman Esq b1626? Conscious 13:15, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright

Copyright problems with Image:E A Drake-Brockman.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:E A Drake-Brockman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

I took this image down until I have more specific permissions from Autralia National Library. Brockmanah 04:07, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

General verifiability

Please could you provide evidence of verifiability for your article sources. A number cite "Exerpts from Drake-Brockman records and scrapbooks, courtesy Hugh Drake-Brockman, UK" (e.g. see Ralph Drake-Brockman#Sources, Sir William Brockman#References) - this is not up to Wikipedia verifiability. Nor is "Much of this information was provided by Paul Brockman (Virginia) who is writing a book on the Brockman family in the US" (see Brockman#References). This all looks like original research.

"DRAKE-BROCKMAN FAMILY" Compiled by BRIG.-GEN D.H. DRAKE-BROCKMAN C.M.G. 1936 provided courtesy of Hugh-Drake Brockman (UK) looks weak too. There is no sign of this book in library records I can find, nor or at Addall.com, suggesting it's some kind of self-published family scrapbook rather than a reputable published source by Wikipedia standards.

I'm also concerned about Edmund Alfred Drake-Brockman, which looks as if it's cut-and-pasted from somewhere. 86.140.183.102 02:09, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 86.140.183.102. I appreciate the help meeting wikipedia's standards but shouldn't you register? I would feel more comfortable accepting the feedback from those who are also contributing articles. Amazon.com can find the the material: (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00089U71U/sr=1-21/qid=1138674744/ref=sr_1_21/102-3411244-0208906?%5Fencoding=UTF8) ASIN: B00089U71U. These out-of-print studies are of the highest quality and are perfectly valid despite being out-of-print. And here is William E. Brockman's Amazon.com and ASIN reference:(http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0007E8Y48/qid=1138674863/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/102-3411244-0208906?s=books&v=glance&n=283155)ASIN: B0007E8Y48. With regard to the Edmund Drake-Brockman article, can you tell me where you claim to have found this copy and paste?

I do not find the material on Edmund site elsewhere on the web. I believe AJackson wrote this material with good scholarship from the references he provided.

..I improved these references - thanks for the feedback

Brockmanah 02:50, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone can submit a title to Amazon these days. Look at the details:

Record of the Brockman and Drake-Brockman family (Unknown Binding)

by David Henry Drake-Brockman

Publisher: D.H. Drake-Brockman (January 1, 1936)

The Brockman scrapbook;: Bell, Bledsoe, Brockman, Burrus, Dickson, James, Pedan, Putman, Sims, Tatum, Woolfolk, and related families (Unknown Binding)

by William Everett Brockman

Publisher: none credited

These are just self-published family scrapbooks. Note again the requirement of verifiability - "already been published by a reputable publisher" (their emphasis, not mine). Furthermore, see WP:NOR: "...it is essential that any primary-source material, as well as any generalization, analysis, synthesis, interpretation, or evaluation of information or data, has been published by a third-party reputable publication (that is, not self-published) that is available to readers either from a website (other than Wikipedia) or through a public library". This disqualifies these sources. Find some acceptable ones, or this material will be binned.

With regard to the Edmund Drake-Brockman article, can you tell me where you claim to have found this copy and paste? I do not find the material on Edmund site elsewhere on the web. I believe AJenkins wrote this material with good scholarship from the references he provided.

I didn't say I'd found it anywhere; I just think it has the smell of copyright violation. A ruddy great chunk of unwikified text, utterly coherent, posted in one go, with a distinctive Edwardian style and phraseology: "Nor was he a social innovator in the mount of HB Higgin". I'll bet you a fiver it's verbatim from the Australian Dictionary of Biography. 86.140.183.102 03:28, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I consider this to be a reputable publisher and that WE Brockman and DH Drake-Brockman produced well-referenced research and published that research. I will add some of WE Brockman's later works, and all of which are available in Virginia libraries et cetera. Furthermore, it is available on websites as you state in the rule at www.brockmanfamily.com, genforum.com (referenced in external links), in the daughters of the revolution and elsewhere. Please take the possibility of plagarism to AJackson's talk page.

Done that part. See Talk:Edmund Alfred Drake-Brockman/Temp. It is from the ABD. They do say it can be used - but only if unmodified. Since the deal with Wikipedia is freedom to modify, no go: it'll have to be rewritten. 86.140.106.125 22:35, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 86.140.183.102:

Please note that these books are available in various US and UK libraries and that other sources are more widely available (eg. Virginia Familes volumes 1-4). The primary source is all of the birth, records, death records, letters and documentation. The Secondary source(s) are these books written to summarize these sources. Therefore I am summarizing the information from these sources in Wikipedia as a tertieary source as described in the verifiablity guideline. I will need some time to collect the additional sources that may be more available to you. Please allow me that time.Brockmanah 15:21, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted a request for outside opinion at Wikipedia talk:Verifiability. I'm happy to go with the consensus. 86.140.106.125 22:35, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Any edit lacking a source may be removed, but do not remove large tracts of Wikipedia without first giving people a chance to provide references to support their inclusion. If you doubt the accuracy or origin of an unsourced statement that has been in an article for a long time, delete it or move it to the talk page." I do not consider 2 days to be "a long time". I have additional sources I can list that are more easily accessed for you and I would appreciate the time to add those. Brockmanah 01:07, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to the sources added thus far I will be adding the following:

Burke’s "Landed Gentry" Burke's peerage Ltd; Jubilee edition, Mr. Bernard Burke, Mr. Gordon Pirrie (Author/Compiler)
Hasted's History of Kent,: Corrected, enlarged, and continued to the present time, from the manuscript collection of the late Rev. Thomas Streatfeild and ... the public records, and other sources, ASIN: B000874L4G
Harris's History of Kent.
The history and antiquities of the county of Essex,: Compiled from the best and most ancient historians; Philip Morant, Reprinted and sold by Meggy and Chalk (January 1, 1816), ISBN: 0715813013, Another republishing, 1978.
The Brockman Papers, (Records in the British Museum).
The Brockman scrapbook;: Bell, Bledsoe, Brockman, Burrus, Dickson, James, Pedan, Putman, Sims, Tatum, Woolfolk, and related families (Unknown Binding)

by William Everett Brockman, ASIN: B0007E8Y48 (Out of Print), this information provided courtesy of Paul Brockman (Virginia)

Record of the Brockman and Drake-Brockman family (Privately Published)

by BRIG.-GEN David Henry Drake-Brockman C.M.G. 1936 provided courtesy of Hugh-Drake Brockman (UK), ASIN: B00089U71U (Out of Print)

Brockman & Drake-Brockman Family Tree : the Australian Branch 1830-1993.

(Menora, WA : Alan Jackson, 1993) ISBN: 0-646-18200-5

I will be working to Harvardize and elaborate on these sources, and I haven't added the Virginia Families Volumes yet, which I will, if you give me some time.

I read the discussion. I agree that the sourcing here is good and up to wikipedia's standards. I can see the editor's point that the books are not widely published, but there is a lot of referencing and a great many people seem to have access to the books. I think it would be better to see how the article stands up to other editors over time, who have collected other data or viewpoints from the web or other sources. I think the material presented compares well with other wikipedia articles of a biographical or geneaolgical nature, particularly referring to a family. Furthermore, if we demand only sourcing out of major publishers, we will only have biograhies of major figures (Bush, Clinton, the Windsors, et cetera) and it would be pleasingly egalitarian to allow more families to have material like this available. Finally, the sourcing here compares well or better than that of other "Encylopeadic" biographical dictionaries like Burke's Peerage and others. In my opinion this article is better sourced than those dictionaries, which occasionally allow mythological anecdotes in the interest of selling more copies.66.30.202.173 01:09, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Timestamp problem

You somehow managed to include a wrong timestamp when you warned Simp123457. How did that happen? —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 15:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC) I don't know - I think I used a copy paste to make teh warning, I may have inadvertently copied a stamp. Brockmanah 16:12, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Brockman

According to my information, he didn't have a middle name. Us Australians have adopted a policy of preferentially disambiguating Australian politicians using "(Australian politician)", so I will move the article to Henry Brockman (Australian politician). Drew (Snottygobble) | Talk 22:29, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More Brockmans in Western Australia

I have just written William Locke Brockman, and added an image to Henry Brockman (Australian politician). Also I have added a number of prominent W.A. Brockmans and Drake-Brockmans to the Brockman article. I will write Edmund Ralph Brockman some time in the next week or so. Drew (Snottygobble) | Talk 02:26, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Drawing_of_arms.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Drawing_of_arms.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 04:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:English_Civil_war_Battle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:English_Civil_war_Battle.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:33, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:St Nicholas Newington.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:St Nicholas Newington.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 82.83.109.169 10:45, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:St Martin Cheriton.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:St Martin Cheriton.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 82.83.109.169 10:45, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Rev Ralph Drake-Brockman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rev Ralph Drake-Brockman.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Radio Kirk talk to me 18:19, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Colby Buzzell

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Colby Buzzell, by 69.218.227.214 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Colby Buzzell seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Colby Buzzell, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Colby Buzzell itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Stafford Brockman

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Henry Stafford Brockman, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Henry Stafford Brockman. Jeepday (talk) 14:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JbrocknmanJrHeadstone.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JbrocknmanJrHeadstone.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JbrocknmanJrHeadstone.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JbrocknmanJrHeadstone.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Brockmanah. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:William Brockman Esq Arms Sketch.jpg

The file File:William Brockman Esq Arms Sketch.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:William Brockman 1566 Arms.jpg

The file File:William Brockman 1566 Arms.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Rev Ralph Drake-Brockman.jpg

The file File:Rev Ralph Drake-Brockman.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Ralph Drake-Brockman. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Brockman Arms 18th century.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Brockman Arms 18th century.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 00:51, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]