User talk:Bulldogalex1

This is Bulldogalex1's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Zelikovsky (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ThePlatypusofDoom was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for academics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two sentences and an infobox does not make an article. Also, there is only one source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexander Zelikovsky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 12:51, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Bulldogalex1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 12:51, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alexander Zelikovsky has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alexander Zelikovsky. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 19:53, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Zelikovsky has been accepted

Alexander Zelikovsky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 19:54, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Recent African origin of modern humans, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Joe (talk) 10:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Misnomer. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 03:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Judo, you may be blocked from editing. 9³ (talk) 05:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 06:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unsourced Xenophobic gibberish such as this is unacceptable. Your shift from seemingly benign edits to this is bizarre to the point that I somewhat believe your account has been compromised. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 06:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]