Jump to content

User talk:Bvcitizen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Rsk6400 (talk) 06:27, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 06:29, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Response

[edit]

I don’t know much about Wikipedia editing as I’m used to fandom editing but I’ll try and remember to add summaries. And I’m sorry if I’m doing this wrong I don’t know how talk pages work

Well, you have the replying part down, but please make sure to always sign your comments with four tildes: ~~~~. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 03:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ok, Also feel free to change “Former Countries of Afghanistan” as I was just coping “Former Countries of the United States” Bvcitizen (talk) 03:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former Countries of Afghanistan has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Former Countries of Afghanistan has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 03:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Response

[edit]
Go for it I think it’s a good idea. Bvcitizen (talk) 04:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:CASP flag (alternatehistory).png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CASP flag (alternatehistory).png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fascist states

[edit]

Hello, Bvcitizen, and Welcome to Wikipedia! I notice you have added Category:Fascist states to a couple of dozen articles. I first noticed this at Vichy France, but the category is not an appropriate addition to that article, because "Fascist state" is not a defining characteristic of the Vichy regime. Accordingly, I've removed this category from that article. If you disagree, you can raise a discussion at the article Talk page about it, but please read Wikipedia:Categorization first, and in particular, the discussion of "defining characteristics" on that page. This same principle may apply to some of the other articles you changed, as well. Thanks, and happy editing! Mathglot (talk) 18:50, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel as though I have added some categories wrongly feel free to change that as I was following my gut and doing it on the fact they were puppet states, though I do feel as though Vichy can be considered Fascist as there leader was a fascist. Bvcitizen (talk) 2:10, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
I undid another dozen or so changes to categories. I appreciate your desire to improve the articles, that's what we're all here for, but we don't change articles based on our gut feelings, but rather based on what independent, secondary, reliable sources have to say about any given topic. WP:Verifiability is a key principle for adding content to an article, and WP:Categorization has its own special considerations. Your bold edits are welcome here, that's also a key principle, but as you are still new here, if you find yourself about to repeat the same edit in dozens of articles, maybe try it on just one or two of them at first, and see how that goes.
You can also ask questions about a proposed edit before you make it, in various locations: the most logical if it pertains mostly to just one article, is the Talk page of the article itself. If it applies to a whole topic, like, say, client states of Japan, say, you could ask a question at the Talk page for the WikiProject page for Japan, namely: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan. You can also visit the WP:Tea house, and ask any question at all about Wikipedia. Finally, you can ask a question here on your Talk page, and add the token, {{Help me}} to your message, and an experienced editor will come along and answer your question right here. Hope this helps, Mathglot (talk) 19:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It does I have the tendency to get all fired up when my edits are undone but I’m currently trying to keep that u see check and key but thanks. Bvcitizen (talk) 19:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Understandable, but if it makes you feel any better, even after you've been here for many years, you'll still have some of your edits undone; that's just the way it goes in a collaborative environment with thousands of editors, and you learn not to react adversely. See WP:BRD for how to deal with reverts in general. If it's about a content dispute, the first place to go is the article Talk page, and there are other methods of dispute resolution, as well. HTH, Mathglot (talk) 20:57, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah thanks. Bvcitizen (talk) 6:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Socialist parties

[edit]

Hello BVcitizen, putting every progressive, green, or liberal party into "State and local socialist parties in the United States" is using way too broad a brush. I see no support for classifying green parties as "socialist" in the individual party articles, or in the green politics article, for that matter. Not every party that is left of center qualifies as a "socialist" party. Regarding edit reversion, please remember WP:BRD, and refrain from re-adding the category in cases where I've reverted it until it's been discussed, either here or at my talk page, further. Thanks. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 22:16, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@BubbaJoe123456: Category:State and local socialist parties in the United States, that is what the category is called that sounds like a category that holds socialist parties, some Green Parties hold Eco-Socialism and Social Democracy and I quote “ Social democracy is a political and social philosophy within socialism“. There is nothing in that category saying that strictly plain socialist parties are to be added. Bvcitizen (talk) 22:21, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bvcitizen&oldid=1124500836"