User talk:Cameleditor

Welcome

Hello, Cameleditor, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community - subscribe to The Signpost, our illustrated monthly newspaper, and have it delivered directly to your talk page.

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Daniels Jerkins (talk) 20:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Cameleditor, you are invited to the Co-op!

Hi there! Cameleditor, you are invited to The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please join us! I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Solar eclipse of February 26, 1979, you may be blocked from editing. KH-1 (talk) 12:26, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:30, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cameleditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Because I did not vandalize after my final warning issue by KH-1 above, he made the warning then proceded with the report by when I have already packed it in

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:23, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Cameleditor (talk) 12:32, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

I see multiple vandalism edits here, with warnings removed by you, followed by further blatant vandalism a full two days after you had been warned and had removed the warnings. In cases like this of repeated blatant vandalism, you were lucky to get any warnings at all, and it's no good whining about it now. To be unblocked, I think you'll need to make a much better case. Squinge (talk) 13:12, 23 March 2015 (UTC)