User talk:Carsonbanks812

Feedback (Annie, 1)

Hey Carson!

Your page looks really good and I like your image. Even though I wasn't suppose to, before I knew that, I went through your page and made a few minor changes (wording, added a few brackets too). Still, I would go through at least one more time and get all the brackets in order. Overall, your page was really easy to read and I understood most of what you were trying to convey.

I left a note on your page (whoops) under the metamorphic section... I was suggesting that maybe you could put that information in a list fashion? Just to break up all the words? Or even a table.. <-- you can get that template from another page that uses a table.

Underneath the Metamorphism header, what is the significance of the higher water pressures? You might want to be a little clearer on that.

You might need to go through and check your references.

You might not feel like doing this, but it would be pretty interesting to do a timeline of the events, or even a timeline image of the content break-up and reforming? IT's a lot, but it's really cool stuff you're talking about.

Also, your last short paragraph (right before the reference list) seems a little out of place. The information is cool, but maybe you can move it somewhere else on the page.

You did a great job!!

--- Annie — Preceding unsigned comment added by A.bre.clare. (talk • contribs) 23:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback Jiawei

Hi, Carson

Your page is nice. I like the layout of your page, it's readable and well arranged. The description table on the right is very informative, although I think you might want to improve the resolution and to increase the size of your "Four distinct metamorphic complexes" figure. It's hard to read, and I had to click this image to get a bigger （yet still not well enough) version.

I have a few suggestions for you, hope you find them helpful.

In the head part of your article, you mentioned four geological units: Napier Complex (Archaean), Rayner Complex (late-Proterozoic), Lützow-Holm Complex (LHC) (early-Paleozoic) and Yamato–Belgica Complex (early-Paleozoic). And in the following Metamorphism section, you only introduced three major metamorphic core complex, all included except the Yamato - Belgica Complex. Is the Yamato - Belgica Complex not a major metamorphic core complex? It's better to give a introduction to this geological unit.

Your title is Geology of Enderby Land. It's a very board topic and includes tons of information and aspects. I understand it's hard to fully cover this topic, but since this place is antarctic, I think it's better to add a subtitle like Glacial activity or anything related to the glacier. That plays an important role in geological time scale.

In metamorphism section. Can you try to add a figure about the pressure and temperature for different metamorphism phases. That helps viewer with little background about the metamorphism.

The content is concise and easy to understand. It's a good article for general geology knowledge concerning the Enderby land. Some slight improvement may make it better! I think what you create is a good job.

Jiawei Zuo MichaelZuo (talk) 05:56, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Carsonbanks812, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!

Hello Carsonbanks812,

let me introduce myself, Graeme Bartlett as an on-line ambassador to your Wikipedia work. I am here to help you with the Wikipedia technical and social world. You can ask me questions or chat to me on my talk page at User talk:Graeme Bartlett, or you can email me by using this page: Special:EmailUser/Graeme Bartlett. I will be looking at your work on Wikipedia to see what I can suggest to you. Once your page goes live I will see if I can nominate it for the WP:Did you know to get it listed on the front page. I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:55, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geologic History and Tectonic Evolution of Enderby Land, East Antarctica (November 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

j⚛e decker ^talk 19:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Carsonbanks812, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! j⚛e decker ^talk 19:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geology of Enderby Land, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dykes, Amalgamation and Archaean. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geology of Enderby Land, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ma and Moho. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Porcupine Seabight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caledonian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Porcupine Seabight

Hi Carsonbanks812. Thanks for your edits to the Porcupine Seabight article. You've added a lot of information and the article is undoubtedly better thanks to your hard work. Just a couple of suggestions, if I may. First, please could you include edit summaries when you change pages? This allows other editors to know what you're up to and why. And second, I noticed you had removed some non-geological content from the page without explanation, which might have been a mistake. Don't worry as I've reinstated this information, which was referenced and may be of interest to the general reader to whom Wikipedia panders. Thanks again for your constructive edits and good luck with you studies. --Wavehunter (talk) 07:36, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review: Bryan Mogrovejo

Carson I am very impressed with the lay out of your page, but could you include more information in your Geologic History section. I understand that there was rifting, but what geological event caused this, what plate tectonics were involved? Was there volcanic activity? Extensional, compressional activity? Basin inversion? The carbonate mounds were formed by the traps of fine sediment from corals, during what time in history did these corals form and what depositional environment was before and after the cold water corals? If you could provide more information on the tectonic history of the region that would be great, but overall the page looks really good with your figures, I know I have to put some on mine also. This gave me some idea on what I should include in my wikipedia page. Bmogro1 (talk) 00:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Bmogro1[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Porcupine Seabight, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Morphology, Dyke and Deformation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Geologic History and Tectonic Evolution of Enderby Land, East Antarctica concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Geologic History and Tectonic Evolution of Enderby Land, East Antarctica, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Geologic History and Tectonic Evolution of Enderby Land, East Antarctica

Hello, Carsonbanks812. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Geologic History and Tectonic Evolution of Enderby Land".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Geologic History and Tectonic Evolution of Enderby Land, East Antarctica}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —CraigyDavi (T∙C∙@) 18:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Enderby Land, East Antarctica Geology.pdf

A tag has been placed on File:Enderby Land, East Antarctica Geology.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:19, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]