User talk:Catgull1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi You can talk here if you

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Draft:Cattish ( Made up language ). Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use your sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. 2A01:4C8:49:B2A2:205E:AFFF:FE8D:848C (talk) 10:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a joke edit, and it is not intended for a joke. Please follow me on scratch, https://scratch.mit.edu/users/DogManLoc/ is the link. Also, go to MultiCraft and enter my wonderful server with the code HJCIPZ5P . (talk) 11:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

October 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Prolog. I noticed that you removed topically relevant content from Putler. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Prolog (talk) 12:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: I need more bullets (October 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Maliner was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Maliner (talk) 10:43, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Catgull1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Maliner (talk) 10:43, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article I need more bullets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Also, it's literally a rejected draft that was moved into mainspace.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OutsideNormality (talk) 21:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article I need more bullets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not satisfy web notability or general notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of I need more bullets for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I need more bullets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I need more bullets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 11:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ? (November 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Kilaseell was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I suggest this gets deleted.
Kilaseell - Message me! - 20:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
oh yeah im just fiddling about wikipedia (im tryna figuring out functions) you may delete it if you want. @Catgull1 (talk) 20:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Catgull1 (User)[edit]

Hello Catgull1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Catgull1 (User) for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Catgull1 (User) to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TartarTorte 21:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to user pages and sandboxes[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at The Rite of Spring . Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 21:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]