User talk:Ccsu student

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ccsu student, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 08:07, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Toyota 86[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because it did not meet one or more of our policies. Feel free to read more there, or contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Kevin 12xd (contribs) 02:04, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shipman & Goodwin[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shipman & Goodwin, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 02:28, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Chris Murphy (politician), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 02:29, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ccsu student. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 02:54, 31 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Thanks Malik. What would be considered "my own words" and a reliable source. For instance if I put that they are a law firm founded in 1919 and by whom then cite with USNews and World Reports is that acceptable? I'm sort of confused on what qualifies, thanks for your help.

To get an idea of what types of sources are considered "reliable sources" on Wikipedia, please see WP:Identifying reliable sources. US News and World Report is definitely considered a reliable source.

When I say to use your own words, I mean that you can't simply copy and paste the text from the source. That's a copyright violation, and by law we can't allow that. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:31, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ccsu student. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 02:18, 13 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Thanks Malik for your help. I have 2 items their marketing team gave me that I uploaded to flickr. I don't know if they are good enough sources, one is a press release. Unfortuantely they are too old to be online anywhere else. I also rewrote the first paragraph. Would you let me know before you publish it sot hat I can look for it once it's up? Thanks. Ccsu student (talk) 14:07, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Unfortunately neither would be considered a reliable source on Wikipedia. Please review WP:Identifying reliable sources for more information.

With respect to the first paragraph, it takes more than changing "serves the needs of" to "provides services to" in order to avoid copyright violation. I've made a change myself. Let me know what you think. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Malik,

Thanks again for your help with this. I finally found news sources for the Rudolph and First Website claims and changed the citations. Also I have changed the first paragraph. Let me know if I'm getting closer. Thanks. Ccsu student (talk) 20:01, 19 July 2013 (UTC)ccsu_student[reply]

Hi. You can go ahead and move the sandbox page to Shipman & Goodwin. It would be better if it had more sources, but I think you've probably got all there is. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ccsu student. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 20:32, 25 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shipman & Goodwin (January 1)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shipman & Goodwin.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 18:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ccsu student, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shipman & Goodwin (May 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shipman & Goodwin.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 08:07, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shipman & Goodwin concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shipman & Goodwin, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shipman & Goodwin[edit]

Hello Ccsu student. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Shipman & Goodwin".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shipman & Goodwin}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. C 679 11:34, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]