User talk:CeraWithaC
Userpage
[edit](talk) Thanks to Me, Myself & I (☮) for helping me with this page :D
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi CeraWithaC! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 08:03, Monday, September 19, 2016 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Help me!
[edit] | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with... Conflict of Interest & Other Concerns
I want to write my first Wikipedia article, however I want to be sure that there aren't any conflict of interest issues and that it meets all the guidelines. Here are the full details:
The article I want to write is for Crime Scene, which is a website that features fictional crime cases through realistic case documents which can be investigated by the public. Crime Scene started in 1995 and was described by its creator as one of the "first internet hoaxes"Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).and is now described as a "unique combination of interactive fiction and gaming".[1]
Notability: When the website first went live, it was the subject of some controversy due to the fact that it was presented as a real crime. Several people who visited the website believed it to be real.[2] The controversy was written about in some reputable publications (I have 3 so far but I'm still trying to track some down). And the site was mentioned in the book Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace.[3] Crime Scene was later involved in litigation with the band Slipknot over a copyright dispute regarding the use of one of Crime Scene's characters as the title of, and possibly the inspiration for, one of Slipknot's songs.
Conflict of Interest: I have been a fan and member of Crime Scene for about 2 years, and I have been a contributing/freelance writer for them for about 3 months. I volunteered to write the Wikipedia article for the site since I've been getting more involved with editing on Wikipedia and I am truly interested in Crime Scene as a subject, but I will be receiving compensation.
If I'm understanding it correctly, in order to comply with guidelines I must and/or should do the following: 1. Include a disclosure statement on my User Talk page as well as on the Talk page (or in the edit summary) accompanying any paid contribution. 2. Put it through the Articles for Creation process and have it peer reviewed.
I am more than willing to do any/all of these. Would this be okay, and is there anything else I should do to ensure that the article is acceptable?
Thanks!
CeraWithaC (talk) 03:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ "FAQ". Crime Scene. Retrieved 1 July 2017.
- ^ Mullen, Steve. "For Arriola, all the Internet's a stage, but ethical questions are raised". Crime Scene. The Oxford Eagle. Retrieved 1 July 2017.
- ^ Murray, Janet. "Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace". Google Books. Simon and Schuster. Retrieved 1 July 2017.
- Hi, Cera. I'm an administrator on Wikipedia, and hopefully I can answer some of your questions. Yes, if you've been paid to create the article, you must disclose that. You are also expected to be upfront about any conflict of interest, especially when editing. You aren't strictly required to do anything else when creating a new article. However, the best practice for any editor with a COI is to create new articles through articles for creation (AFC).
If you don't go through AFC, it will be assumed that you're familiar enough with our guidelines and policies that you don't need any help. As a result, the article will be judged in what may seem a very harsh manner, including the possibility of immediate deletion. If you want my opinion, it's much better to take advantage of AFC, even though it may seem like you're being directed to a ghetto version of Wikipedia for COI editors. This way, you avoid the frustration of having your article deleted with minimal explanation. AFC is also useful in getting feedback for many of the issues you've described, such as neutrality and notability.
There isn't really an easy answer for notability, but once you've got multiple sources independent of the subject that describe it in significant detail, you've satisfied the absolute minimum requirements to create an article. Beyond that, the more sources you have, the better. I personally consider four independent sources a good minimum when I create a new article; otherwise, there's the risk of deletion. The Teahouse, a forum for new users, can help immensely in getting started on Wikipedia, especially when it comes to navigating Wikipedia's more confusing or bureaucratic areas. You may also wish to read this guide. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:15, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui 雲水 12:04, 11 August 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Your submission at Articles for creation: Crime Scene (web site) has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Robert McClenon (talk) 01:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC)ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, CeraWithaC. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)