User talk:ChatruSamhara

Welcome!

Hello, ChatruSamhara, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as File:VCKChief.jpg, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —SpacemanSpiff 12:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:VCKChief.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:VCKChief.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 12:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Thirumma.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Thirumma.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 12:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, ChatruSamhara. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 13:51, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Bishonen | talk 10:21, 7 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]

May 2016

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:02, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 7 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ChatruSamhara (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a common system used by research scholars in Tamil arts forum, chennai. Here plenty of users are using the system for different purposes such as browsing,gathering info etc.It is not possible to monitor all the time about the behaviour of users. And moreover I dont know all the users mentioned as the puppetry user accounts. But among them three are my friends doing the same research project. Already I mentioned the same when dispute arose previously. All of the users mentioned here are my colleugues and we all are working on the same project. See Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi is a party started newly to fight for weaker sections of the society.Our project is related to Tamil Nationalism. Recently this party is promoting Tamil nationalism very much. So we started research on this party. We wanted to add the same to wikipedia also. We all contributed collectively to the wikipedia on same or similar topics. But everywhere we added proper citations and links and references. We always maintained a neutral point of view. All our contributions can be verified through citations and references. We never involved in vandalism or in any kind of disruptive behaviour. Whenever any dispute arises on a particular topic, we used talk pages to discuss with the concerned persons and if any citations required we gave. But mistakenly some users took it as personal they thought all of us as a single person involved in puppetry.But that is not true actually. It is not a mistake if more related users contributes to the same topic from same system.The thing is whether the information given by the people is factful and verifiable through citations or references. Among the mentioned users may be some users had breached the wiki policies. But for that single reason if we block the entire users ,I think it is unfair and in future it will prevent different view points in different topics.It will prevent the free flow of knowledge.So I request the reviewing admin to unblock all the users mentioned here including my account. May be in future if anybody breaches wiki policy a warning should be send to the particular user seperately. Once again I m stating that it is a common system used in research lab and it is difficult to control all the users.We need wikipedia user accounts in different time for different purposes. So please take immediate action.

Decline reason:

Formal response: if there's no way to distinguish between you, neither technically nor behaviorially, we have to trreat you all as the same person. Less formally: we just have no reasons to believe you. Max Semenik (talk) 17:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.