User talk:Claviere

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

dirty corporations[edit]

i could swear someone is hired by Kinross Gold to regularly monitor this article and make sure none of us reveal any of the ugly truths of gold mining. to the employee: get yourself some moral standards and find a new job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 07:08, 8 September 2011 (UTC)


ARE YOU A WRITER - I OPPOSE DELETION OF THE ARTICLE — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

advertising medium[edit]

I didnt write the article you removed nor am i opposed to its removal but I do wonder what you saw as advertising material in Polysomnographic technician Je.rrt (talk) 15:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Blocking template[edit]

Please leave it be--no good can come from this edit-warring. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 19:42, 23 August 2011 (UTC)


Hi! I noticed that you were very quick to reverting that annoying vandal. Have a cookie for dealing with them. :) Sophus Bie (talk) 05:43, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

No Spam Barnstar Hires.png The No Spam Barnstar
For tirelessly combating spammers :). D Namtar 03:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

A brownie for you![edit]

Brownie transparent.png Hello Claviere! I hope you accept this brownie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

jeanclaudeperez user and codexbiogenesis request[edit]

dear sir yes my reuest was to suppress the bad and conflicting old content of my talk page in my jean-claude perez user section! many thanks authorizing this task best regard jean-claude perez alias codexbiogenesis examples from my reseach: — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 17:56, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Frozball[edit]

Hello Claviere. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Frozball to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Arguable, but I think "hoax" implies intent to deceive; if it was claimed that this was played worldwide, or an Olympic sport, I would go along with "hoax", but these guys have really invented a game and want to tell the world about it. They don't understand that's not what WP is for, and it fails WP:NFT, but that's not a speedy reason. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:03, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Can't disagree with that :-) Thanks, Claviere (talk) 17:06, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey[edit]


New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Claviere! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Nomination of Silicon Milkroundabout for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silicon Milkroundabout is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silicon Milkroundabout until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FunkyCanute (talk) 11:45, 10 November 2011 (UTC)