User talk:Coachinghunt

August 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Michelle Williams (actress) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Michelle Williams (actress) was changed by Coachinghunt (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869651 on 2021-08-24T18:47:13+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:47, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Emilia Clarke. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 19:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for the inconvenience. Coachinghunt (talk) 19:22, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Faye Dunaway, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Faye Dunaway was changed by Coachinghunt (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874099 on 2021-08-25T04:07:34+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:07, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the inconvenience but I haven’t edited anything wrong so how come is this a vandalism? Coachinghunt (talk) 04:18, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coachinghunt, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Coachinghunt! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Your recent editing history at Scarlett Johansson shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ChicagoWikiEditor (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This will be your final warning before I report you over on the admins board to be banned for your vandalizing edits. You're clearly a sockpuppet account so this should be a quick ban. The edits you've made to the lead on the Scarlett Johansson article is not sourced or in any way supported in the body. Provide a proper source and/or open a talk page discussion for consensus before you make the edit again. You have constantly made this revert, well over 3 times now. Do you have nothing better to do with your time? ChicagoWikiEditor (talk) 00:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. This will not happen again . Coachinghunt (talk) 07:55, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kate Winslet have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kate Winslet was changed by Coachinghunt (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.900434 on 2021-09-16T07:41:58+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]