User talk:Coletti80

This is Coletti80's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Shailendra Singh has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shailendra Singh. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:24, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert! Thank you for this note. I totally agree with you that this page needs to be disambiguated. I would use the term 'serial entrepreneur' for this Shailendra Singh. However, I am quite new to this, and, despite reading the disambiguation page and the manual of style, I can't seem to edit the draft to reflect this. Could I request your guidance for this? Coletti80 (talk) 15:37, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Me again. I'm worried that I need to do something more, like make the disambiguation page link, before my article is approved? But for the life of me, I can't figure out how to do it. You have a moment to help me? Coletti80 (talk) 00:32, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Coletti80, as I mentioned at your RfU request, if you have an external connection with Shailendra Singh / Percept Pictures or his productions or ventures, you will have to disclose the same. See WP:DISCLOSE. Jay 💬 06:37, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I do not. I crossed paths with the man and his social enterprise while working in my capacity as an animal rescuer and a brief connection with the Magic Bus charity that he donated with. But there was so much information about him, I thought I could do a good job of it. These articles were supposed to be practice for writing articles about animal activism and the great companies that are working in India. But, apparently, I'm not doing very well. . . Coletti80 (talk) 10:34, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guestlist4Good (January 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by LordVoldemort728 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

"Unite4Avicii" section is fully unreferenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guestlist4Good and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 15:45, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LordVoldemort728. Yes, you are correct that I neglected the references for the Unite4Avicii section. I have rectified that error and put int he citations. Was this the only section, in regards to citations, that led to the rejection? I have double checked all the rest of the citations int he article with the above criteria, and I am unclear if they were deemed insufficient - or if it was only the Unite4Avicii section? Thank you for your help! Coletti80 (talk) 20:25, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! How do I know if my edits have been accepted or rejected? It's been almost six months and I don't want my article to be deleted. Can someone please help me? Coletti80 (talk) 08:53, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Coletti80! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 15:45, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles[edit]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Shailendra Singh. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:06, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean the link I just added to the disambiguation page? Yes, I also thought it didn't seem correct to do, but in the comments, it made it seem that my article would not be completed for review until I did that. I had asked the original commentator and I had read the Manual of Style, but couldn't figure it out. Thank you for removing it and I will ensure not to do that again.

In regards to this article - can you help me clarify something? As per LordVoldemort's comments, he seemed to only find fault with the one Unite4Avicii section - was this the only section that I needed to rectify. The article is heavily sourced and I am unsure if I am supposed to review and improve every section, or (as I have already done), update the Avicii section and resubmit!? Coletti80 (talk) 21:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Is this the right place to ask the questions that I did above? I have resubmitted the article, the the correct citations in the Avicii section. How do I know that it's back under review - or not? Coletti80 (talk) 14:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shailendra Singh (February 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shailendra Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 01:30, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Guestlist4Good[edit]

Hello, Coletti80. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Guestlist4Good, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Guestlist4Good[edit]

Hello, Coletti80. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Guestlist4Good".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shailendra Singh[edit]

Hello, Coletti80. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shailendra Singh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]