User talk:Conor MacLeod
Welcome
[edit]
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Sheila Bernette
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sheila Bernette requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Crystallized C (talk) 21:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
A review of your edits
[edit]Conor, I've been looking through a few of your edits and have found a pattern that I thought I'd bring up with you.
First, you cannot use the image of an actor playing a part in a film/show in the infobox for the actor. For instance, the image of Samantha Bond which was a screen capture of one of the Bond films. That image can't be used in the infobox in the article for the actress. You can think of it as a picture of the character and not the actor. For the infobox, you'd need a picture of the actor. You've replaced similar images such as that for Penelope Wilton.
Second, when you link to something like The Great Gatsby but you want the link to go to the film, then the link should look like this: ''[[The Great Gatsby (2013 film)|]]'' which will display as The Great Gatsby.
And finally, names of bigger works such as films, books, and television shows should be in italics. So, it would be The Great Gatsby or Doctor Who. Names of "smaller" works, such as songs or episodes should be in "double quotes". Examples of that would be "The Star Spangled Banner" or "Blink".
I've been following behind you and trying to fix the errors that I find but it would help everyone out if you remembered these points and fixed them on your own. Thanks, Dismas|(talk) 22:38, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Conor MacLeod, I see you are still adding non-free images to articles. If you keep doing it, you might be blocked. Please stop. See WP:NFCC and WP:IUP. Nymf (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
November 2015
[edit]
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically Sally Phillips, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:43, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Conor MacLeod. As Dismas and Nymf mentioned above, you need to be careful about adding non-free images to articles. Not every image you see on Wikipedia has been freely licensed. Certain images are considered to be protected by copyright and therefore the way they may be used is limited. Each usage of a non-free image is required to satisfy all 10 of the non-free content criteria (NFCC) listed at WP:NFCCP and not be any of the uses mentioned in WP:NFC#Unacceptable use. Files such as File:Second Best poster.jpg (which you added to Penelope Wilton) and File:Parents cast.jpg (which you added to Sally Phillips) do not satisfy the NFCC and thus should not be used in those articles. It's a good idea to check licensing of any image who want to add to an article before actually adding it. Just click on the image and you will go to its file page. If the image is freely licensed, then you may use it as long as the usage complies with WP:IUP and there is a consensus to do so. If the image is non-free, and you're not sure whether its usage will satisfy the NFCC, you should probably ask about it at WP:MCQ. Using non-free content can be a bit tricky and mistakes are made all the time, even by long-term editors. However, other editors are only willing to assume good faith for so long, so continuing to inappropriately add such images to articles might be seen as disruptive and could lead to you being blocked by an administrator per WP:COPYVIO#Addressing contributors. If you have any questions, feel free to ask them here or at WP:MCQ. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:07, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
- Also, you made all the same sorts of edits that you've been asked not to make. Please stop making work for other people. See my edit here to see what I did to change the material you added. Dismas|(talk) 14:17, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Dove Cameron. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Samantha Bond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Home Fires. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lucy O'Byrne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Late Late Show. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 2
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sara Wiseman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Place To Call Home. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Conor MacLeod. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Conor MacLeod. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)