User talk:Creepercast888

December 2016

Hello, I'm JarrahTree. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JarrahTree 00:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to James Smith

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to James Smith added the name of an apparently non-notable entity. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Epoch Times

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Epoch Times, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Morphdog (t - c) 16:52, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Atheism, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.

I suggest that you take a look at Help:referencing for beginners as a way to get started on making better edits?.

— jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Falun Gong. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 17:24, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stick to reliable sources. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources will help. Doug Weller talk 11:28, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at The Epoch Times. Doug Weller talk 17:50, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at The Gateway Pundit. — Newslinger talk 15:25, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 15:25, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Creepercast888. Thank you. Guy Macon (talk) 19:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]