User talk:Crisopenlms

Thank you for declaring your conflict of interest. That doesn't mean you can write what you like, you must follow the guidance below:

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article.Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:57, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Crisopenlms! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 12:21, Wednesday, August 31, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

More

I saw that you had disclosed your COI, which is why I haven't blocked your account. The Moodle article is dreadful, and I'm likely to delete it. I agree that it should be a redirect to LMS if it gets accepted.

Much of your text is unreferenced, or referenced to the company, press releases or interviews with the company CEO or similar. It's usaully a fair bet that if you can find lots of sources easily, most won't be independent third-party sources as we require.

I agree that it's probably notable, but despite having offices, your text doesn't mention that it has any employees, income or exenditure. For obvious reasons, company articles will be scrutinised. You need everything referenced to appropriate sources, there is little that we will take on trust

The tone is company-speak "this is what we ~~sell~~ offer". Just looking at the first para, we start with the two words Open LMS having their own ref, the only point of which seems to be so you can put in a link to the company saying about itself The world's best LMS is at your fingertips". www.openlms.net. Retrieved 2022-08-31. We also learn that the company is dedicated to providing solutions.

I've seen worse, but you need proper and complete referencing, real facts, and no weasel words like dedicated, solutions, services or focus

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:39, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Open LMS (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources consist of routine business reporting (M&As, channel changes, etc.), interviews, and close primary sources, none of which contribute towards notability per WP:ORGCRIT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Open LMS and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:08, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crisopenlms! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:08, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Open LMS

Hello, Crisopenlms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Open LMS, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Open LMS

Hello, Crisopenlms. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Open LMS".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:24, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]