User talk:DaPigNZ

Warnings

November 2013

Hello, I'm Philip Trueman. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Chiton because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Philip Trueman (talk) 02:43, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DaPigNZ

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DaPigNZ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Vieque (talk • ctb) 23:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Umbrella has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Umbrella was changed by DaPigNZ (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874326 on 2014-06-25T08:03:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:03, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Umbrella with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 08:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to DVD with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 08:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to DVD. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 08:10, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:29, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]