User talk:Dagnytaggartmoxie

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Dagnytaggartmoxie/The Muslim Brotherhood and the CPSU: Architecture and Functions has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Muslim Brotherhood and the CPSU: Architecture and Functions, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 17:15, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Muslim Brotherhood and the CPSU: Architecture and Functions

The article The Muslim Brotherhood and the CPSU: Architecture and Functions has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dbrodbeck (talk) 13:04, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Muslim Brotherhood and the CPSU: Architecture and Functions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Muslim Brotherhood and the CPSU: Architecture and Functions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Muslim Brotherhood and the CPSU: Architecture and Functions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 13:40, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. When you recently edited Sabotage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cyber (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transnational organization

As a major contributor to this article, you may be interested to know I have nominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transnational organization. Robofish (talk) 23:25, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transnational organization, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CAIR and Transnational (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:04, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GroundRisk. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:30, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of GroundRisk (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:29, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]