User talk:Daltonsocial6

Welcome

Hello, Daltonsocial6, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! wia (talk) 02:32, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Orlando Eye

Hi. I reverted your recent edits [1][2] which changed "The Orlando Eye is a giant Ferris wheel" to "The Orlando Eye is a giant Observation wheel" (please note that similar reverts have also been made on three previous occasions [3][4][5]). Please see the first paragraph of Orlando Eye#Design and construction, which already deals with the operator's claim that the Orlando Eye is an observation wheel. Please see also these discussions:

Please also note:

Wheels which are marketed as, or claim to be, observation wheels are all primarily described as Ferris wheels in their respective articles - see High Roller (Ferris wheel), Singapore Flyer, London Eye, Melbourne Star, and New York Wheel. The 'observation wheel' claim is most commonly made for wheels with externally mounted passenger capsules - see the same five articles - as opposed to suspended capsules; the Orlando Eye has suspended capsules.
There is no 'Observation wheel' article; Observation wheel has been a redirect to Ferris wheel#Observation wheels since June 2008.
There is no generally accepted definition for observation wheels (to be an observation wheel, it has been claimed that the wheel must have externally mounted passenger capsules; or have stabilised capsules; or have enclosed capsules; or that the structure be of the cantilever type; or simply that it not be located in an amusement park) and hence there is no Category:Observation wheels.

If you disagree, please feel free to discuss at Talk:Orlando Eye - but do not change the lead description back to 'observation wheel' without first establishing a clear consensus. Thank you. 81.141.58.213 (talk) 20:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:John Joseph Campion has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Joseph Campion. Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:58, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Joseph Campion (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joseph2302 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Joseph Campion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Joseph2302 (talk) 18:10, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Daltonsocial6, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Joseph2302 (talk) 18:10, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Joseph Campion (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Joseph Campion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 19:27, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Daltonsocial6, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 19:27, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Joseph Campion has been accepted

John Joseph Campion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 19:06, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]