User talk:Darthbunk Pakt Dunft

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Darthbunk Pakt Dunft, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

NeemNarduni2 (talk) 14:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Megan Rain[edit]

A tag has been placed on Megan Rain, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gene93k: I replied on the article's talk page. Megan Rain has received at least one significant award since the debate in February. So that above referred to G4 criterium does not apply here. I cannot say if the overall content of the page deleted was different in all aspects but this at least has changed and it changes everything.--DBK PKT DFT (t) 21:00, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Megan Rain[edit]

Hey there! I just wanted to explain why I deleted the Megan Rain page, despite the new award she received. WP:PORNBIO has a criteria for receiving a "well-known and significant" industry award, but the award Rain received does not seem to be significant - the page literally says that the awards show takes place in someone's living room. If you can find a source discussing the award and showing that it is significant, let me know. --Cerebellum (talk) 22:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello@Cerebellum: Too bad. Thank you for the message, anyway. I think that award as Next Porn Superstar is significant, be it only because it is listed on iafd together with XBIZ and AVN awards, and reflects (as was the case here) undeniable notoriety on the Internet. Greetings,--DBK PKT DFT (t) 22:58, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of LightningPaint[edit]

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from LightningPaint, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Pavlor (talk) 10:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lana Zakocela for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lana Zakocela is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lana Zakocela until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ProgrammingGeek talktome 17:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Similar with another article, Lauren Elder has no signs of satisfying WP:ARTIST given there are no museum collections or major art reviews which are listed as needed; the article has no other convincing signs beyond it. SwisterTwister talk 00:45, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@SwisterTwister:-Likewise hello. Nota: You did not notify me about the right Lauren Elder nor did you mention you had prodded the page (You could have opened a new section, as the comparison with Lana Zakocela (or with her page) is, how shall say? not very obvious...), ...I had checked the page about the Lauren Elder you provided the link of (sole survivor, born 1947) and was not sure you were addressing me. (There are very easy ways to notify the right users about the right page with greetings included, through Twinkle, for your information). Anyway I incidentally consulted the right page and I deprodded it. Elder (1990) is notable in the field of contemporary art. Have a good day- darthbunkpakt dunfT 22:00, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deprod: 9/11 Memorial Project – California[edit]

Hello, I have deprodded 9/11 Memorial Project – California, as it was prodded in 2009 and contested, which makes it permanently ineligible for further prods. I only did this for procedural reasons; if you still wish to pursue deletion I wouldn't oppose an AfD. —KuyaBriBriTalk 21:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NPP[edit]

Hi. We appreciate your enthusiasm but maintenance tasks are not for beginners. Please refrain from patrolling pages and tagging them for maintenance or deletion until you have significantly more experience. When you have 200 mainspace edits you will qualify to enroll at the WP:CVUA to learn all about vandalism and what to do about it. It's a much easier task and still extremely important. If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Happy editing!

PS. FWIW, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lycée René Cassin (Gonesse), a French lycée is a high school and it's graduation has an even higher academic level than US or UK high schools. They are all notable. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:10, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@Kudpung:, If I am correct, I have 198 edits in the mainspace on this Wikipedia with this account; +2, and I'll be qualified according to your standards, then.
More seriously, while I may understand your general concern, I am surprised to read a sentence such as "Please refrain from patrolling pages and tagging them for maintenance or deletion until you have significantly more experience" ... !!! as if ANY of my ProD/Afd/comments had been completely out of place. If the case is the Lycée René Cassin, well, I understand it belongs to a sanctuarized category according to you but it is not what the official policy says (WP:Notability_(high_schools), as I am sure you know) firstly, and secondly, I only afded it - not ProdDed, mind you, precisely because I KNEW that policy -, because it had been tagged by another user (in April 2017). Feel free to explain your thoughts to that user if your idea is he did something very wrong. I would rather thank him but it's up to you. Anyway, thank you for your message, although I disagree with part of its content and its slightly patronizing tone, to be completely honest with you.
For your complete information, I don't review NPP, never (to my knowledge) did, and I will not enlist in CVUA, sorry, not interested. I was just trying to address issues on articles with topics of uncertain notability that had already been tagged. If current policies on this Wikipedia do not allow such tagging, I am not the one you wanted to talk to; if the fact of addressing those concerns by relatively recent (more than one year) users is not allowed, I was not aware of that and still cannot believe this forbidding appears anywhere in general guidelines. Happy editing to you too, darthbunk pakt dunft 14:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that you do not understand the difference between 'policy' and 'guideline' and therefore are not versed in our notability criteria, clearly demonstrate that you do not (yet) have sufficient experience fot this kind of work; with 200 edits you'll first qualify to learn about vandalism which is generally considered to be the first stepping stone for those who are determined to make a Wikicareer in the maintenance areas rather than contribute new content. There is nothing patronising at all in being frank and telling you that and asking you politely not to do something that you are getting wrong. Also, I do not make up the rules here - everything is governed by community consensus (which I actively help to craft) - which I simply implement and have been doing as an admisn for a very long time and as a user for even longer. Thank you for your comprehension. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:17, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Kudpung:. Apologies if I perceived a patronizing tone where none was actually meant. As for the differences between policy and guideline on Wikipedia, and my lack of understanding of them explaining to what extent I would not understand notability criteria, I will not comment upon that statement of yours; but you will note that you still failed to show me one single Prod/Afd by me that was clearly wrong.
For the rest, your conception of heuristic on Wikipedia and what steps it should involve and in what order preferably, is yours, I will not try to convince you otherwise (however, I am not interested in vandalism, sorry, allow me to repeat myself and I will not deal with vandalism issues on Wikipedia), nor did I ever express or conceive any doubt that you are an experienced and trusted user here. If I gave you any impression that I had, I am sorry but that was not my intent. Thank you for taking the time to explain your views. Greetings. darthbunk pakt dunft 15:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The first post I made in this thread is a boilerplate I conceived and use but the heuristics we use here are a Wikipedia tactic. I have to chase away up to 30 users a day from messing with NPP and with an enormous backlog of 22,000 totally rubbish articles, it's no joyride and doesn't leave time to examine each user personally who got a deletion tag wrong. Sorry if you got caught in the net - it happens. Nobody is forcing you to to stick around and chase vandals it's just another area where some help is needed. BTW, you might like to have another look at an article you created. I've edited out some content that didn't belong there but I didn't check the history to see who inserted it. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:39, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kudpung: You mean you wrote your first message without checking if I had done anything that might be wrong? (Again, I never edited/reviewed NPP, as far as I know, except pages I created, obviously). Your message was just a reminder of Wikipedia Netiquette, then? Ok, sure.

I checked rapidly Luma Grothe, if that was the page you had in mind. Thank you for editing the page. Not sure I understand what you're asking me precisely, though. The Twitter/Instagram might have been me, at a time when I saw that other pages had them (but things have changed, apparently). wasn't me. I have only one edit on the page (as my Doppelgänger, I had forgotten that[DO 1]) (i.e. its creation). The other one, not sure at all, was me, but if it was a spam, you did well to remove it and thank you. Once again, greetings, darthbunk pakt dunft16:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ I generally do NOT edit the same pages with my two accounts. In fact, I hope I never did and my intention was to keep Art with this account and Other with GB, but I got mixed up and then I was wrongly blocked for a loooong while on the Fr. WP. Not that this might interest anybody now.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Darthbunk Pakt Dunft. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Darthbunk_Pakt_Dunft&oldid=1089583719"