User talk:Dnaile mrbonez

February 2024

Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tim Burton, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Princess Bride (film). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Princess Bride (film) was changed by Dnaile mrbonez (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888177 on 2024-02-05T05:39:03+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:39, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rain Man, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 05:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rain Man. Larry Hockett (Talk) 05:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. I am allowed to edit my own sandbox wikipedia. Why are you reverting my edits? It's not public. This is my own and you are hurting my feelings! Dnaile mrbonez (talk) 05:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, wp:sandboxes are for practicing editing articles. Not for vandalistic or disruptive edits. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dnaile mrbonez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

II apologize for making disruptive edits on Wikipedia. I believed at the time that I was editing in my own private sandbox page, as I am new to this and would like to get better. I had no idea any of my edits were public. I now understand that my actions were disruptive. Again, I apologize, and humbly ask to be unblocked. Thank you. Dnaile mrbonez (talk) 12:54 am, 5 February 2024, Monday (8 days ago) (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

That's fine as far as it goes. Please describe more specifically what topics you would edit about. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My future edits will have factual information, and I will cite reliable sources to support the content I contribute. I have familiarized myself with Wikipedia's content guidelines and policies, and I am committed to adhering to them strictly. Thank you. Dnaile mrbonez (talk) 19:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you be more specific? What topics do you want to edit? PhilKnight (talk) 02:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am interested in music. Years and dates are my specialty. I'd like to contribute interesting anecdotes and fact-check any content that may not be reliable. Dnaile mrbonez (talk) 03:26, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dnaile mrbonez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Dnaile mrbonez (talk) 03:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Reading our guide to improving articles.
Picking any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.

Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}}),
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]),
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]),
  - and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits have any citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking using {{unblock}} and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 10:05, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I hope you're well. I have taken a contemplative break from addressing this issue. During this break, I have familiarized myself with Wikipedia's regulations. I am asking if it'd be possible to unblock me and restore my editing privileges. I never meant to vandalize anything, I was simply under the impression that I was in a personal sandbox, my edits being not public or disruptive. However, I realize now that I wasn't in a sandbox and was editing REAL Wikipedia pages. Again, I apologize. This mistake will not happen again. Please consider unblocking me. Dnaile mrbonez (talk) 03:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have offered you a path to being unblocked. I'm quite concerned that, above, you indicated you plan to contribute anecdotes. If that's still your intention, it shows a profound lack of understanding of what Wikipedia is all about. Hopefully by now you already understand how inappropriate this would be, and you can demonstrate your clear understanding by following the path I have offered you. --Yamla (talk) 10:05, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]