User talk:Dnvrfantj

Please use the speedy deletion tag with discretion.--CSTAR (talk) 05:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: February 2008

Do you mind telling me what this is about? My only edits today that involved removing information were this and this. Both were unsourced speculation. Bill ^{(talk|contribs)} 20:23, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

I haven't removed a lot information from the GTAIV article at all recently. I have reverted an edit removing a bulk of information from an article though. These are diffs of all my edits to the article in the past week [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. You must have mistaken me for another editor. Bill ^{(talk|contribs)} 20:34, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry about it, no problem. Bill ^{(talk|contribs)} 20:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Ten Thousand Fists

That article needs refrences. There are none and accoridng to this stupud websites rules, to create a page you must have refrences. All that can really be proven are its the third album by Disturbed, who the band is and the tracks. Its the websites rules.

Rollback

You have been granted with the rollback permission on the basis of your recent effort on dealing with vandalism. The rollback is a revert tool which can lessens the strains that normal javascripts such as twinkle put on the Wikipedia servers. You will find that you will revert faster through the rollback than through the normal reversion tools such as javascripts and the undo feature, which means that you could save time especially when reverting very large articles such as the George W. Bush page. To use it, simply click the link which should look like [rollback] (which should appear unbloded if you have twinkle installed) on the lastest diff page. The rollback link will also appear on the history page beside the edit summary of the lastest edit. For more information, you may refer to this page, alternatively, you may also find this tutorial on rollback helpful. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 23:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:53, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Paul Herget.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Paul Herget.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 04:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Unblock/Questions

• A note has been left with the blocking admin for more information but the history of the following links will explain how/why the block came about. [7] [8] (Only admins can read deleted contribs - sorry). This is clearly unacceptable and immature behaviour by at least one user using many accounts or many users who know each other. Whether it justifies an indef block is another matter (bearing in mind the user has a reasonable amount of NPP speedy noms) but I strongly suggest to the account holder that they come clean on what the hell they were playing at, do some apologising and give us some decent assurances of future behaviour. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

• I understand that it was an immature act, but the only contribution I had towards this was that I created the story. The user PHerget was the user that posted the Article, and created multiple accounts. I only have 2 accounts created on my IP address, none of which stemmed from me. Like I said, I didnt even make the article. Im willing to take responsibility because my friend obviously didnt know the guidelines, and Im sorry for what happened, so im willing to take the heat, but the user PHerget was doing it in good faith. He did delete the db-a7 tags, but he just wanted to prolongue his articles lifetime. I have talked to him in person about the results of what happened and how it should never happen again. Like I said, Ill take the ban, but at least let me know how long Im banned for so I dont keep trying to revert other vandalism. --Dnvrfantj (talk) 07:13, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

• Completely incorrect. You, not PHerget, created the article (in the mainspace) on the 15th, when it was deleted a first time by me. You claimed then that it was an A7 (non notable bio), not a G3 (pure vandalism)[9], which was not only quite irrelevant but plainly wrong. But what caused the block now was that you didn't feel "sorry for what happened" and that "it should never happen again". You congratulated some of the involved users and made it clear that you intended to continue such behaviour[10], [11]. Now, I don't care if the other involved accounts are your friends or just sockpuppets: you created a vandalism article, tried to defend it, then applauded the people who recreated it, and then here tried to minimize your actions by ignoring all these facts.
• If some admin wants to reduce the block, be my guest, that's what indefinite (as opposed to infinite) blocks are for, but please consider the above when doing so. Fram (talk) 07:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

• This has nothing to do with the fact that I put the article up the first time. The first time, PHerget didnt even know about it. This time, he took it from my sandbox, and then posted it himself. Look in see the history of the page Paul Herget, you will see that I didnt post the article. Also in response to what you said, I said I was sorry for what happened, which does include what I said to them. Its possible to be sorry for not realizing the error in my judgement at the time. You're saying that apparently when people pray and repent their sins to God, they really can't be sorry because it already happened. Im not going to deny the statements that I made, they did happen, and they were out of good faith, considering I was intoxicated that night. I said I was sorry and I told you that it wouldn't happen again. The story is obviously gone and will never be up again. Obviously sober, Im apologizing for all of the grief that occured from this article. You can see from my contributions that I am an anti-vadalism user, and I had a major faux-paue or however you spell it, but let me continue my old work, and I will tell that that it wont happen again. If it does, you can ban me for eternity. One last thing, the reason why I want you to set a duration for my block is because youre one out of two that have responded to my unblock tab, after being up for about 5 hours, so please just set a time. Once again, my apologies for what happened the other night and I hope this conflict can be resolved within minutes. --Dnvrfantj (talk) 08:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

• Ok, give me a minute or two to read my demanding daughter a book first and I'll shorten the block. OK? Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:35, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

• Please wait a second. Looking further into this, I just noticed that he is clearly more involved in this than he wants us to know. The page Paul Herget was recreated February 21 at 4:00 AM by Donutoblivion (an account created at 3:47 AM the same day), and marked as patrolled by Dnvrfantj the very same minute[12]. This clearly shows that he was very much involved with the recreation of this page, but tried to hide it a bit by using a different account. This directly contradicts his statement of 7:13 AM this morning that "the only contribution I had towards this was that I created the story": he created it, posted it a first time, marked it as patrolled the second time, and applauded his "friends". My assumption of good faith doesn't stretch that far... I suggest keeping the user blocked for now, and filing a checkuser request first. Fram (talk) 08:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

• Agreed. This is clearly more complex then first sight suggested. Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:16, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

• Thanks. While more thoroughly checking all his related edits, it becomes quite obvious how the current "ooh, I was intoxicated" excuse differs from the original unblock requests, where he claims that he wanted to tag it as A7 himself at the time :-) [13]. I have now filed a checkuser request, Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dnvrfantj. Fram (talk) 09:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

• Will you please stop telling them what I "did" because you obviously don't know what happened so actually try to understand what Im reading and stop judging. My friend put up the article, and I marked it as patrolled, yes. You say I wanted to put up the A7 tags, that is incorrect. If you look, I took down tht unblock request because it was a lie, and in matters like this, lying doesnt help anything. You also question my intoxication, and I dont expect you to believe me b/c there is no way to prove it, but I was. Another thing, you say, "It is quite obvious that Dnvrfantj is 134.197.105.143", wrong again. That IP address belongs to McLovin13375. My IP address is 75.15.208.87. Also stemming from your review, I will tell you that there were 3 different users deleting the A7 tags. 1 user had the accounts Donutoblivion, Pabloh1989, and Pherget. The 2nd user had the accounts McLovin13375, and MaxinDaHouse1010. The IP addresses also belong to them. The 3rd user was Buzz tanner. So you see, your accusation that I "posted it" is false. I dont understand why this is so confusing. I've told you everything you need to know, and even claified some of it here. Another thing, you didn't quite understand me when I said "I only have 2 accounts created on my IP address, none of which stemmed from me." Im saying that these are my only 2 accounts, and the 2nd one had no involvment wtih what happened. At this point,and dont think Im trying to brownnose you, but thanks for actually engaging in discussion with me and other admins, I really appreciate getting the chance to put forth my knowledge and opinions towards the subject. Thanks. --Dnvrfantj (talk) 21:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

• You shouldn't have removed the other two unblock notices but since this is still being reviewed I'm not going to lock down your user page. I am discussing your block with Fram. Please be patient. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

• Sorry, I wasnt sure about deleting the unblock thing. I will be sure to keep the current one up. Thank you. --Dnvrfantj (talk) 21:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

• Okay, I've reduced the block to 31 hours from now, which will make the overall block about 3 days. You've promised to avoid this kind of behavior in the future and Spartaz and I are both willing to extended good faith that you will simply return to your previous activities. Mangojuice^talk 19:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

• Don't worry, I will. Thank you so much. Im just curious as to why my page still says Im indefinately blocked on my user page. Im a really still indefinately bocked or is that box wrong? --Dnvrfantj (talk) 20:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

The box is just a message, and is now out of date. To see your block status, look at your block log. Mangojuice^talk 22:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Rollback redux

As you've been unblocked and haven't abused rollback, I've returned the tool to you. Please ask me if you have any questions or need any help. Best regards, Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 02:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Tim Russert.

No one's perfect, dude. Thanks for correcting it, but responding on my talk page might have been slightly overkill. dposse (talk) 02:31, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

My friend, not everyone is the same. If i'm mistaken, then i'm mistaken. That was such a small issue that i wouldn't have any problem with it. Give your fellow Wikipedians the benefit of a doubt. If they have a problem with something that you do, they will likely come to you first. That is how this place works. If people are giving you a hard time about edits, then you can ask for help here, ask others for help, ect. I'd be more then glad to help you out with any situation that you have. The best advice i can give you: Make an edit and don't second guess yourself. Stand by it. The community itself will judge its worth and take action or not. Again, thanks the the correction. dposse (talk) 02:47, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Your wiki "handle"

You've chosen a rather unique moniker for wikipedia. I can't figure out what, if anything, it means? Care to share?

(Oh, btw, it's never an intrusion to post a comment on someone's Talk page, unless of course someone verbally assaults you or vandalizes your page.)

PainMan (talk) 12:12, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

I had guessed that "Dnvr" stood for Denver; but the rest eluded me. With a smattering of random numbers/letters included this would (have) made a good password.

PainMan (talk) 23:15, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Your recent editing

Please refrain from editing or you will be banned from Wikipedia. thank you.