User talk:Docenterna

Welcome!

Hello, Docenterna, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 18:16, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Docenterna, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Docenterna! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mathias Uhlen (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RileyBugz was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You should source everything in the article body to reliable sources. If you can't source it, then remove it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mathias Uhlen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RileyBugz ^会話 _投稿記録 23:16, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries, please

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 06:55, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mathias Uhlen (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article is notable as it stands, but the WP:SOURCES have not been formatted correctly. Currently the source are using a form of WP:BAREURLS bare urls, which leads to WP:LR, i.e. link rot. Link rot are urls which degrade over time, and cant be verified as a resources, or site URL has moved. Proper sources use the following:

Template:Cite web to cite web pages. Template:Cite journal to cite a journal pages. Template:Cite book to cite a book Template:Cite news to cite news

Each one has a set of properties which enable you to site a DOI or a PDF, pmid, chapter, issue, for example. Each one can be accessed on the edit bar at the top of the edit window, which is a utility that will open a dialog box. Fill it in, and it will create the ref.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mathias Uhlen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep (talk) 12:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mathias Uhlen (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs sources about the subject, not just his works. First and last paragraphs are still unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mathias Uhlen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 03:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mathias Uhlén

The article Mathias Uhlén has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

User have a close connection to subject. WP:PAID WP:COI

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gujimall (talk) 06:13, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Real-time sequencing by synthesis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Real-time sequencing by synthesis. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:08, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Real-time sequencing by synthesis (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul Vaurie was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Real-time sequencing by synthesis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 22:50, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Real-time sequencing by synthesis

Hello, Docenterna. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Real-time sequencing by synthesis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Real-time sequencing by synthesis

Hello, Docenterna. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Real-time sequencing by synthesis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]