User talk:DoraShin15/Archives/2022/January

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Aalta Phoring

A tag has been placed on Draft:Aalta Phoring requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

been moved to mainspace

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 11:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I requested deletion of the redirect, because it has already moved into mainspace. Thanks. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 11:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

@Itcouldbepossible: Ok. Btw it's not necessary. Shinnosuke15, 11:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Maybe, but why did you move to mainspace so early? It was still under development. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 13:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

There you go, now it is back in the draft space again. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 13:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

CSD G5s

Hello, Shinnosuke15,

Please do not tag articles or draft for CSD G5 speedy deletion reasons if there are any edits from other editors, contributing to the article. CSD G5 are for pages where the ban-evading editor was the primary or only contributor. And it is not for mere sockpuppets but for editors who have been blocked and are evading their block through the use of sockpuppets. That latter condition was true in this case but there were other editors who contributed edits to the articles you tagged. CSD G5 is probably the most tricky speedy deletion criteria there is. Thank you! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

@Liz: Ok, thanks for the advice. Shinnosuke15, 08:49, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pathan (film) (January 7)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is an upcoming film and does not satisfy any version of film notability.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission.

It should be noted that the reviewer has not decided that the topic is not notable. An article on the topic may be accepted in the future. However, there is no reason to think that this draft will become an article, and there is evidence that this draft will never become an article. If there is to be an article on this topic, this draft must first be blown up and started over.

If this draft is resubmitted without discussion and without starting it over, or if an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection by starting over, a partial block or a topic-ban may be requested against the submitting editor.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:03, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Shinnosuke15! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:03, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

@Robert McClenon: I've nominated the draft for CSD. Is it okay? Shinnosuke15, 00:07, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Aalta Phoring

When the article Draft:Aalta Phoring will be available? The show will start today and all issues seems to be resolved. I doubt it will ever be reviewed as there are negligible AfC reviewers specializing Bengali TV. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/List of reviewers by subject. Have a nice day ! 2402:3A80:6CC:D49D:3CF1:3ABB:37FA:A6E (talk) 11:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Until it's reviewed and accepted. Shinnosuke15, 11:54, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

I don't think it will pass through AfC anytime soon because of above stated reasons. Till then wait for the best. 2402:3A80:1A44:53FA:8B12:C4B0:ADBC:DFB4 (talk) 13:20, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

You can request any reviewer to review that draft. Shinnosuke15, 14:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

@Shinnosuke15 I think it is best to move it directly to mainspace. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 15:07, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

@Itcouldbepossible: I had tried this before, you know. But it was moved back to draftspace. Shinnosuke15, 15:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Yes, because at that time, it was not fully developed. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 03:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Good observation

I found you tagged this to Guddi (TV series) and I too believe you are right. Its really impossible to get such unpublished details. But the original creator has been writing articles since very long time here (since 2017) plus has created articles related to Magic Moments Motion Pictures (see this) and has been watched by many admins. Thus, I would request to keep an eye on the article so that new editors don't interpret it wrong and tag for deletion. The articles paases WP:NTV and WP:GNG and filming is in progress and expected to release next month as per creator so WP:TOOSOON is also a weak point for this case. I will request the editor to disclose the paid obligation. Good work. Keep it up. 2402:3A80:1C40:F326:70BC:B551:3D94:A187 (talk) 14:53, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Also, use WP:RATER for applying Wikiproject banners in talk pages if you are editing from desktop. 2402:3A80:1C40:F326:70BC:B551:3D94:A187 (talk) 14:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

@Itcouldbepossible: You complained at WP:ANI regarding Guddi (TV series). But I think the immediate result would be deletion/draftify of the Guddi (TV series). You did not present evidences against the creator so that an admin can take action nor provided sufficient time to disclose the editor. Please calm down and go systematically. Best regards. 2402:3A80:1C40:F326:70BC:B551:3D94:A187 (talk) 15:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Ok sorry, actually I hate paid editing. That is why, I got over exited. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 15:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

It can be also possible that the creator has put fake information about the cast. Shinnosuke15, 16:12, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

@Itcouldbepossible and Shinnosuke15: See it has been nominated for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guddi (TV series). The information dont seem to be fake as the creator has previously created true articles in past and now due to over-excitment of ICRB reporteing at WP:ANI has led the article put to deletion request and 99% it will be deleted because notability of Indian shows are not like the American shows which most editors here will not take into account. The problems will be arisen when recreated again as the WP:NPP patrollers will conclude the article as promotional article next time. Nothing constructive has come out until now by reporting at WP:ANI. I would request Itcouldbepossible to concentrate more on learning better about Wikipedia policies beside editing and creating so that they can avoid such incidents next time. I feel it was an un-necessary action from your sides. Its only an opinion from my side only. Nothing intended against you. 2402:3A80:1C40:F326:CC6:A870:EF14:6B68 (talk) 17:19, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

If the article is deleted, you can request the deleting admin to undelete it. Or you can create a draft and submit it for review by putting {{subst:submit}}, which is a very lengthy process. It will be a plus point if the name of the show is something else, as no source confirms the name of the show. I also suggest you to create an account for editing. Shinnosuke15, 17:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Gosh! What a mistake? Can I withdraw my request? I did not understand things would be going to so far. Yes you are right Amkgp, from next time I must be careful before creating threads at ANI. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 03:42, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

I have made a keep request, see if you can do the same. Thanks. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 03:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)