User talk:Doth Shall Be Rewarded, Thine Shall Be Rewarded & Thou Hath Rewarded
Fan of William Shakespeare.
Doth Shall Be Rewarded, Thine Shall Be Rewarded & Thou Hath Rewarded, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Doth Shall Be Rewarded, Thine Shall Be Rewarded & Thou Hath Rewarded! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kinbo Corporation (kinbo.biz)[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Kinbo Corporation (kinbo.biz), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 17:05, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
May 2021[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kinbo Corporation(kinbo.biz)[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Kinbo Corporation(kinbo.biz), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 17:53, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Doth Shall Be Rewarded, Thine Shall Be Rewarded & Thou Hath Rewarded (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The user Drmies has made it a personal vendetta to block my account and they have done it many times not just with us but with other people also. I have disclosed that I am being paid by companies to write articles for them but still user Drmies is blocking my account over and over again. All of my articles abide by Wikipedia's policies and none of my articles are self-promotional(as accused by user Drmies). Biographical information about companies are not self-promotional content. The distinction between self-promotional content and biographical content is well understood by me. In none of my articles, I did not add superlative adjectives to any companies but still this prejudice is being carried out by people like user Drmies. I demand my account to be unblocked at the earliest convenience and I would like this matter to be handled with the utmost respect. This is not the community Wikipedia so proudly boasts about.
Decline reason:
You seem to be admitting that you are indeed setting up multiple accounts. That'd be a violation of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE and means the block is indeed appropriate. If you have only ever used one account, please feel free to make a new unblock request and specifically state that. Yamla (talk) 18:56, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Doth Shall Be Rewarded, Thine Shall Be Rewarded & Thou Hath Rewarded (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yamla instead of looking at my claim, is trying to change the topic. Yes, it is true, I have opened two different accounts because User:Drmies kept blocking my account from Wikipedia. I also forgot the password of my another account and for this reason I decided to create one. I am not sure if you know it or not, but according to Wikipedia's Forgot Password Section, instead of reseting account passwords, we are allowed to open another account because creating an account is simpler than resetting the password. I hope that the main reason behind me opening two accounts is clear. Now, let us talk about why I was blocked. I was blocked because according to User:Drmies, my article which I spent a week writing on was declared self-promotional. The user Drmies has made it a personal vendetta to block my account and they have done it many times not just with me but with other people also. I have disclosed that I am being paid by companies to write articles for them but still user Drmies is blocking my account over and over again. All of my articles abide by Wikipedia's policies and none of my articles are self-promotional(as accused by user Drmies). Biographical information about companies are not self-promotional content. The distinction between self-promotional content and biographical content is well understood by me. In none of my articles, I did not add superlative adjectives to any companies but still this prejudice is being carried out by people like user Drmies. I believe that User:Yamla did not have all the facts at first sight and that is why they proceeded to decline my unblock claim but User:Drmies has blocked thousands of peoples' account for no reason. I am also very happy to support my claim with verifiable evidence. No, wait... somebody already wrote an ENTIRE article about User:Drmies' abuse of power in Wikipedia. [redacted attack site]. I feel violated and sad because this is not acceptable. What User:Drmies is being doing is unacceptable. I am sure that this falls under online harassment and cyber bullying. I am however willing to look over the abuse of power User:Drmies has done, if my account is restored, my article is placed in Wikipedia's mainspace and User:Drmies does not continue with their online bullying practise.
Decline reason:
I'm going to make this easy. You've admitted to creating another account to bypass a block. A third account was confirmed to be yours as well. And you're basically using blackmail to say you will "look past" what an admin rightfully did if your blatant promotional article is accepted. I'm removing talk page access, since it's clear you are here simply to promote your business. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:24, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Multiple unblock requests[edit]
You now have three (!!!) open unblock requests. This is inappropriate. Which single one do you wish to be reviewed? Please remove the other two (leaving the declined unblock request in place and unedited). --Yamla (talk) 13:59, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- Also I'm just going to add, linking to an external attack page of an admin is NEVER going to work to get unblocked. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:26, 7 May 2021 (UTC)