User talk:Doublz

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Zaydx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: Under WP:DWS - What Not To Do, its very clearly written - "Do not ever call someone a sock puppet on an article or user talk page or in any edit summary. Doing so is often considered uncivil and can actually get you in trouble. If you suspect they are a sock, then file a report at WP:SPI or put a polite note to this effect on any active admin's talk page."

But you don't seem to follow that rule considering your response to me on Talk:KSI (entertainer) and in your edit summary as well. You don't deserve checkuser access because you falsely block people then proceed to celebrate their block on talk pages of major articles and in the edit summaries as well. -Doublz (talk) 13:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting User:Xeno or User:SoWhy to take the CheckUser access from @NinjaRobotPirate for blatant abuse of it. -Doublz (talk) 15:44, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Calling out few biased editors that abuse their power

My original account was User:ArbaazAli15, I was falsely blocked because I use my college computer to use wikipedia, and I got blocked because some other student in the past has used this computer to use wikipedia & edit youtuber pages (like me). I explained in my unblock request that I'm in a literal college where hundreds or thousands of students have probably used wikipedia and its easy to find 2 people with overlap in edits but regardless, my unblock request was declined by User:Yamla because he wasn't "buying it". So that's why I created this account because I still believe I was falsely blocked. Allow me to call out some biased editors who blatantly take advantage of new users and let me explain why I was unfairly treated and falsely blocked.

So the reason why my User:ArbaazAli15 was threatened to be blocked by @Formulaonewiki makes literally no sense at all. And I explained it on User talk:ArbaazAli15 in detail on how many rules @Formulaonewiki has broken but as expected that whole paragraph was completely ignored, because I assume @Formulaonewiki is friends with other editors (particularly User:Yamla) so he can't get in trouble.

The reason why my User:ArbaazAli15 was threatened to be blocked by @Formulaonewiki was because I was trying to add combined "combined subscriber count" to Sidemen. A combined subscriber count is when a YouTuber has multiple channels, so you add the subscriber counts of their multiple channels and show their combined subscriber count. Its perfectly fine and has been used on many wikipedia pages (some of which @Formulaonewiki himself has been editing on for a long time) of most Youtubers' that have multiple channels, some of the big names include - KSI, Logan Paul, MrBeast, Etika, Lazarbeam, Smosh etc. No source has been used on any of those pages for their combined subscriber counts as its usually a simple case of addition of the sub counts that you can easily check on youtube. So I find it extremely surprising that as soon as I added the combined subscriber count to Sidemen it became a problem for @Formulaonewiki as he repeatedly started undoing my edit and started telling me that I need a reliable source for the combined sub count to be added even though its literally just addition of the sub counts AND no source for combined sub counts has been used on any of those pages of the youtubers that I just mentioned. @Formulaonewiki accusing me is for the said thing is ironic in itself because he literally undid my edit of the combined subscriber count just to change the combined subscriber count to what it was 4 months ago, thereby making it an outdated stat and then backing that outdated stat to what he claimed as 2 "reliable sources" when in reality, the first one was not even reliable as per WP:RSPSOURCES and the second one states nothing regarding their combined sub count as we can see that here.

Now here's where it gets scummy, @Formulaonewiki came to my talk page and threatened to block me and I was made to believe that I was "adding original research". Which is false because routine calculations such as this do not count as original research per WP:CALC. Which means that @Formulaonewiki is guilty of the third rule of "Grounds for checking" of CheckUser Policy i.e. "Threaten another editor into compliance in a content dispute" as I was repeatedly threatened for a potential block even though I didn't even break a single rule. And guess what, the very next day after I was blocked, combined subscriber count was added to Sidemen (the same edit for which I was blocked) and @Formulaonewiki agreed for that inclusion without any hesitation which not only proves that I was adding the right edit all along but also proves that @Formulaonewiki had personal bias against me and wanted me to get blocked somehow.

My account User:ArbaazAli15 is still falsely blocked while @Formulaonewiki was never even questioned for what he did. I begged for my account to be blocked (even though I never broke any rules on any of my edits in the first place as I explained above) and explained in detail what @Formulaonewiki has done. My unblock request was rejected twice and me calling out @Formulaonewiki was entirely ignored. Not a single person has given a valid response of my explanation of what @Formulaonewiki has done because they probably are all friends with him, he's roaming freely after all he did while my account User:ArbaazAli15 remains falsely blocked. And just for saying this and calling him out, I'm probably gonna get my talk page access removed so I can't respond.

That's why I'm asking for the attention of arbitrators to look into this - User:AGK , User:Beeblebrox , User:Bradv , User:Xeno , User:SoWhy , User:DGG , User:SoWhy , User:Joe Roe , User:Maxim , User:Mkdw

Hope someone neutral looks into my situation and take necessary action. -Doublz (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I have had basically no interactions with Formulaonewiki in my years on Wikipedia. According to the Editor Interaction Analyser, I have 98,285 edits at the time of writing and they have 3894 (note, this takes several minutes to determine). Of those, we have both edited 11 of the same pages (five of the same user/talk pages). Note that I currently have 6,807 pages on my watchlist, by comparison. I honestly have no opinion of Formulaonewiki. And for the record, we don't know each other (to the best of my knowledge) outside of Wikipedia, either. --Yamla (talk) 16:23, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maxim has revoked talk page access and email access. --Yamla (talk) 16:35, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: I don't believe it needs saying—my edits are all logged and there to see—but these accusations are clearly baseless. I never threatened any user, in fact, I only left one standard template talk page message asking them to follow Wikipedia's guidelines on RS and OR and engaged in one article talk page discussion. My only direct interaction with any other user with regard to the blocked editor was appealing to NinjaRobotPirate for advice, not due to any personal connection, but purely because I knew they were a relatively experienced editor with administrator and checkuser privileges. Thanks for spotting the sock. —Formulaone wiki 08:44, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]