User talk:Dpshow

Dpshow, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dpshow! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jacqueline Fernandez has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jacqueline Fernandez was changed by Dpshow (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927697 on 2018-08-14T14:21:42+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:21, 14 August 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Dpshow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22512 was submitted on Aug 31, 2018 08:47:33. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:47, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reason to be unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dpshow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi! I believe I have been blocked because I am considered as a Sockpuppet. However this is a misunderstand. This might have been caused due to the fact that I used 2 different laptops having different IP's this is because I have one laptop my office and one at my home. However It is had to believe that is a justifiable reason to be blocked But this might be the reason as I have researched a little online. 2= Another reason

Decline reason:

No, this is not the reason you were blocked. The reason is explained at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Archietherave10/Archive and the sockpuppetry is confirmed. Yamla (talk) 11:00, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reason to be unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dpshow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi I have read the Sockpuppet page. If im not wrong I have been accused of using multiple accounts to bias a the point of view of a page or multiple pages in my favor. I do not really understand this because I have been using this account since July and the only way that I be accused of being a Sockpuppet is if I login to Wikipedia from another account on this system or my other system. But that has not happened. If I have been accused of being a sockpuppet may I know what conversation I have tried to Bias? The only proper conversation that I have had is with a contributor named GSS regarding the page Hrithik Roshan citation 151 I provided sources and article which state otherwise and since it is not really possible to know the true facts I decided to change the statement to a more neutral statement. But this is the only account I have used to have a conversation. Moreover I have had other accounts in the past but I did not know how to get an unblock ticket hence I decided creating a new account. I would want the admin to understand that I am desperately trying to understand Wikipedia and the community and hence in the process I do make mistakes for example I did not know about the 3RR rule but I got to know about. If I am blocked continuously how do I learn. Now of the Edits from any of the accounts in present or past were done without strong citations. Please let be have the opportunity to learn the community. Thank you admin.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 20:22, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.